Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Idaho

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Idaho
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Idaho

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Idaho Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Idaho

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Challis 100.0% 22.8% (+77.2)#1 24.1% (+75.9)#134
2. Rockford Bay 100.0% 22.8% (+77.2)#2 24.1% (+75.9)#413
3. New Meadows 100.0% 22.8% (+77.2)#3 24.1% (+75.9)#429
4. Moore 100.0% 22.8% (+77.2)#4 24.1% (+75.9)#554
5. Huetter 100.0% 22.8% (+77.2)#5 24.1% (+75.9)#652
6. White Bird 100.0% 22.8% (+77.2)#6 24.1% (+75.9)#909
7. Arco 85.7% 22.8% (+62.9)#7 24.1% (+61.6)#1,136
8. Teton 81.2% 22.8% (+58.4)#8 24.1% (+57.2)#1,293
9. Gooding 71.5% 22.8% (+48.7)#9 24.1% (+47.4)#1,743
10. Sugar City 66.7% 22.8% (+43.8)#10 24.1% (+42.6)#2,082
11. Dubois 66.7% 22.8% (+43.8)#11 24.1% (+42.6)#2,104
12. Ucon 65.4% 22.8% (+42.6)#12 24.1% (+41.3)#2,284
13. Paris 65.4% 22.8% (+42.6)#13 24.1% (+41.3)#2,285
14. Genesee 65.2% 22.8% (+42.4)#14 24.1% (+41.1)#2,298
15. Fruitland 64.0% 22.8% (+41.2)#15 24.1% (+40.0)#2,396
16. Wallace 63.6% 22.8% (+40.8)#16 24.1% (+39.6)#2,425
17. Nezperce 61.9% 22.8% (+39.1)#17 24.1% (+37.8)#2,620
18. Kimberly 59.8% 22.8% (+37.0)#18 24.1% (+35.8)#2,887
19. Hansen 59.4% 22.8% (+36.6)#19 24.1% (+35.3)#2,920
20. Franklin 58.8% 22.8% (+36.0)#20 24.1% (+34.7)#2,991
21. Ririe 58.3% 22.8% (+35.5)#21 24.1% (+34.3)#3,045
22. Cambridge 58.3% 22.8% (+35.5)#22 24.1% (+34.3)#3,054
23. Weiser 54.0% 22.8% (+31.2)#23 24.1% (+29.9)#3,616
24. Arbon Valley 53.3% 22.8% (+30.5)#24 24.1% (+29.3)#3,712
25. Moreland 51.4% 22.8% (+28.5)#25 24.1% (+27.3)#3,998
26. St Maries 50.0% 22.8% (+27.2)#26 24.1% (+25.9)#4,129
27. Idaho City 50.0% 22.8% (+27.2)#27 24.1% (+25.9)#4,189
28. Kooskia 50.0% 22.8% (+27.2)#28 24.1% (+25.9)#4,202
29. Onaway 50.0% 22.8% (+27.2)#29 24.1% (+25.9)#4,343
30. Elk River 50.0% 22.8% (+27.2)#30 24.1% (+25.9)#4,384
31. Rupert 48.6% 22.8% (+25.8)#31 24.1% (+24.5)#4,604
32. Montpelier 47.5% 22.8% (+24.6)#32 24.1% (+23.4)#4,814
33. Rigby 47.1% 22.8% (+24.3)#33 24.1% (+23.1)#4,872
34. Parma 46.9% 22.8% (+24.1)#34 24.1% (+22.8)#4,919
35. Driggs 46.9% 22.8% (+24.1)#35 24.1% (+22.8)#4,922
36. Fort Hall 46.3% 22.8% (+23.5)#36 24.1% (+22.3)#5,012
37. Weippe 45.5% 22.8% (+22.6)#37 24.1% (+21.4)#5,171
38. Worley 45.5% 22.8% (+22.6)#38 24.1% (+21.4)#5,175
39. Potlatch 44.7% 22.8% (+21.9)#39 24.1% (+20.6)#5,310
40. Kamiah 44.1% 22.8% (+21.3)#40 24.1% (+20.0)#5,442
41. Soda Springs 43.6% 22.8% (+20.7)#41 24.1% (+19.5)#5,559
42. Hazelton 43.5% 22.8% (+20.7)#42 24.1% (+19.4)#5,567
43. Homedale 43.4% 22.8% (+20.6)#43 24.1% (+19.4)#5,581
44. Georgetown 43.3% 22.8% (+20.5)#44 24.1% (+19.3)#5,598
45. Firth 42.9% 22.8% (+20.0)#45 24.1% (+18.8)#5,699
46. Roberts 41.8% 22.8% (+19.0)#46 24.1% (+17.7)#5,968
47. Tyhee 41.6% 22.8% (+18.8)#47 24.1% (+17.5)#6,037
48. Melba 40.6% 22.8% (+17.8)#48 24.1% (+16.5)#6,245
49. Jerome 40.6% 22.8% (+17.8)#49 24.1% (+16.5)#6,252
50. Preston 39.8% 22.8% (+17.0)#50 24.1% (+15.7)#6,537
51. Osburn 39.3% 22.8% (+16.5)#51 24.1% (+15.2)#6,634
52. Marsing 38.7% 22.8% (+15.9)#52 24.1% (+14.6)#6,765
53. Kellogg 38.5% 22.8% (+15.7)#53 24.1% (+14.5)#6,802
54. Oldtown 38.5% 22.8% (+15.6)#54 24.1% (+14.4)#6,842
55. Sandpoint 38.3% 22.8% (+15.5)#55 24.1% (+14.3)#6,874
56. Cottonwood 38.2% 22.8% (+15.4)#56 24.1% (+14.2)#6,897
57. Downey 37.9% 22.8% (+15.1)#57 24.1% (+13.9)#6,993
58. Mountain Home Afb 37.5% 22.8% (+14.7)#58 24.1% (+13.4)#7,073
59. Parker 37.5% 22.8% (+14.7)#59 24.1% (+13.4)#7,097
60. Dayton 37.5% 22.8% (+14.7)#60 24.1% (+13.4)#7,105
61. Aberdeen 36.8% 22.8% (+14.0)#61 24.1% (+12.8)#7,294
62. Mullan 36.4% 22.8% (+13.5)#62 24.1% (+12.3)#7,422
63. Orofino 36.1% 22.8% (+13.2)#63 24.1% (+12.0)#7,512
64. Hagerman 36.0% 22.8% (+13.2)#64 24.1% (+11.9)#7,527
65. Greenleaf 35.7% 22.8% (+12.9)#65 24.1% (+11.6)#7,593
66. Richfield 35.7% 22.8% (+12.9)#66 24.1% (+11.6)#7,605
67. Victor 35.2% 22.8% (+12.3)#67 24.1% (+11.1)#7,770
68. Rathdrum 35.1% 22.8% (+12.3)#68 24.1% (+11.1)#7,778
69. Iona 33.9% 22.8% (+11.1)#69 24.1% (+9.79)#8,153
70. Payette 33.3% 22.8% (+10.5)#70 24.1% (+9.26)#8,236
71. Hayden Lake 33.3% 22.8% (+10.5)#71 24.1% (+9.26)#8,307
72. Hollister 33.3% 22.8% (+10.5)#72 24.1% (+9.26)#8,376
73. Peck 33.3% 22.8% (+10.5)#73 24.1% (+9.26)#8,476
74. Menan 31.0% 22.8% (+8.21)#74 24.1% (+6.96)#9,162
75. Ferdinand 30.8% 22.8% (+7.95)#75 24.1% (+6.69)#9,280
76. Moscow 30.7% 22.8% (+7.84)#76 24.1% (+6.59)#9,300
77. Pocatello 30.1% 22.8% (+7.24)#77 24.1% (+5.98)#9,499
78. Horseshoe Bend 29.4% 22.8% (+6.59)#78 24.1% (+5.34)#9,749
79. Lapwai 29.3% 22.8% (+6.45)#79 24.1% (+5.19)#9,789
80. Culdesac 28.6% 22.8% (+5.75)#80 24.1% (+4.49)#10,053
81. Stites 28.6% 22.8% (+5.75)#81 24.1% (+4.49)#10,094
82. Pinehurst 28.3% 22.8% (+5.51)#82 24.1% (+4.26)#10,157
83. New Plymouth 27.9% 22.8% (+5.05)#83 24.1% (+3.79)#10,304
84. Troy 25.9% 22.8% (+3.10)#84 24.1% (+1.85)#11,010
85. Bovill 25.0% 22.8% (+2.18)#85 24.1% (+0.924)#11,433
86. Lewiston 24.8% 22.8% (+1.99)#86 24.1% (+0.736)#11,503
87. Post Falls 24.8% 22.8% (+1.97)#87 24.1% (+0.711)#11,506
88. Salmon 24.6% 22.8% (+1.79)#88 24.1% (+0.539)#11,558
89. Twin Falls 24.3% 22.8% (+1.52)#89 24.1% (+0.262)#11,663
90. Carey 24.3% 22.8% (+1.50)#90 24.1% (+0.248)#11,673
91. Castleford 23.1% 22.8% (+0.256)#91 24.1% (-1.000)#12,174
92. St Anthony 22.9% 22.8% (+0.071)#92 24.1% (-1.18)#12,247
93. Wendell 22.9% 22.8% (+0.036)#93 24.1% (-1.22)#12,261
94. Idaho Falls 22.9% 22.8% (+0.033)#94 24.1% (-1.22)#12,271
95. Cascade 22.6% 22.8% (-0.240)#95 24.1% (-1.50)#12,380
96. Hauser 22.6% 22.8% (-0.240)#96 24.1% (-1.50)#12,385
97. Ponderay 21.9% 22.8% (-0.903)#97 24.1% (-2.16)#12,694
98. Caldwell 21.8% 22.8% (-1.04)#98 24.1% (-2.29)#12,742
99. Garden City 21.6% 22.8% (-1.18)#99 24.1% (-2.43)#12,788
100. Plummer 21.1% 22.8% (-1.77)#100 24.1% (-3.02)#13,016

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Idaho?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Idaho are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
85.7%
#8
81.2%
#9
71.5%
#10
66.7%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Idaho?
Challis has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Idaho with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of Idaho?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Idaho is 22.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.