Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Flint Creek 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#1 24.1% (+75.9)#108
2. Old Green 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#2 24.1% (+75.9)#246
3. Gregory 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#3 24.1% (+75.9)#337
4. Covington 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#4 24.1% (+75.9)#340
5. Cleo Springs 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#5 24.1% (+75.9)#364
6. Marshall 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#6 24.1% (+75.9)#384
7. Barber 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#7 24.1% (+75.9)#387
8. Sand Hill 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#8 24.1% (+75.9)#396
9. Chance 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#9 24.1% (+75.9)#399
10. Notchietown 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#10 24.1% (+75.9)#421
11. Canadian Shores 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#11 24.1% (+75.9)#439
12. Watts 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#12 24.1% (+75.9)#475
13. Dry Creek 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#13 24.1% (+75.9)#545
14. Alderson 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#14 24.1% (+75.9)#583
15. Lake Ellsworth Addition 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#15 24.1% (+75.9)#608
16. Zena 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#16 24.1% (+75.9)#630
17. Colony 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#17 24.1% (+75.9)#665
18. Oak Hill-Piney 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#18 24.1% (+75.9)#679
19. Bradley 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#19 24.1% (+75.9)#692
20. Monroe 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#20 24.1% (+75.9)#710
21. Lequire 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#21 24.1% (+75.9)#712
22. Fairmont 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#22 24.1% (+75.9)#724
23. Armstrong 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#23 24.1% (+75.9)#738
24. Lawrence Creek 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#24 24.1% (+75.9)#753
25. Platter 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#25 24.1% (+75.9)#767
26. Smithville 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#26 24.1% (+75.9)#786
27. Hoffman 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#27 24.1% (+75.9)#791
28. Blackburn 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#28 24.1% (+75.9)#793
29. Atwood 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#29 24.1% (+75.9)#800
30. Bache 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#30 24.1% (+75.9)#828
31. Felt 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#31 24.1% (+75.9)#834
32. Loco 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#32 24.1% (+75.9)#853
33. Lima 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#33 24.1% (+75.9)#855
34. Oakwood 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#34 24.1% (+75.9)#876
35. Hitchita 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#35 24.1% (+75.9)#892
36. Emet 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#36 24.1% (+75.9)#903
37. Swink 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#37 24.1% (+75.9)#915
38. Dripping Springs 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#38 24.1% (+75.9)#919
39. Badger Lee 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#39 24.1% (+75.9)#922
40. Sugden 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#40 24.1% (+75.9)#929
41. Peckham 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#41 24.1% (+75.9)#936
42. Rosedale 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#42 24.1% (+75.9)#952
43. Mutual 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#43 24.1% (+75.9)#956
44. Piney 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#44 24.1% (+75.9)#961
45. Avard 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#45 24.1% (+75.9)#966
46. Jefferson 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#46 24.1% (+75.9)#968
47. Fitzhugh 95.8% 29.8% (+66.0)#47 24.1% (+71.8)#976
48. Burneyville 94.7% 29.8% (+64.9)#48 24.1% (+70.7)#981
49. Custer City 93.3% 29.8% (+63.5)#49 24.1% (+69.3)#994
50. Taloga 88.9% 29.8% (+59.0)#50 24.1% (+64.8)#1,066
51. Carmen 83.3% 29.8% (+53.5)#51 24.1% (+59.3)#1,219
52. Foss 83.3% 29.8% (+53.5)#52 24.1% (+59.3)#1,225
53. Tenkiller 82.4% 29.8% (+52.5)#53 24.1% (+58.3)#1,250
54. Crowder 81.8% 29.8% (+52.0)#54 24.1% (+57.7)#1,272
55. Shady Point 81.4% 29.8% (+51.5)#55 24.1% (+57.3)#1,288
56. Watonga 81.2% 29.8% (+51.3)#56 24.1% (+57.1)#1,299
57. Whitesboro 80.0% 29.8% (+50.2)#57 24.1% (+55.9)#1,349
58. Kildare 80.0% 29.8% (+50.2)#58 24.1% (+55.9)#1,355
59. Devol 77.8% 29.8% (+47.9)#59 24.1% (+53.7)#1,438
60. Lowrey 76.5% 29.8% (+46.6)#60 24.1% (+52.4)#1,497
61. Dover 76.5% 29.8% (+46.6)#61 24.1% (+52.4)#1,501
62. Warwick 75.0% 29.8% (+45.2)#62 24.1% (+50.9)#1,576
63. Keyes 75.0% 29.8% (+45.2)#63 24.1% (+50.9)#1,581
64. Ratliff City 75.0% 29.8% (+45.2)#64 24.1% (+50.9)#1,591
65. Beggs 73.7% 29.8% (+43.8)#65 24.1% (+49.6)#1,637
66. Wapanucka 72.7% 29.8% (+42.9)#66 24.1% (+48.7)#1,684
67. Toppers 72.6% 29.8% (+42.8)#67 24.1% (+48.5)#1,698
68. Keys 71.7% 29.8% (+41.9)#68 24.1% (+47.6)#1,739
69. Cedar Valley 71.4% 29.8% (+41.6)#69 24.1% (+47.4)#1,755
70. Garvin 71.4% 29.8% (+41.6)#70 24.1% (+47.4)#1,771
71. Moodys 71.0% 29.8% (+41.1)#71 24.1% (+46.9)#1,797
72. Nicut 70.0% 29.8% (+40.2)#72 24.1% (+45.9)#1,855
73. Dill City 70.0% 29.8% (+40.2)#73 24.1% (+45.9)#1,858
74. Greenfield 70.0% 29.8% (+40.2)#74 24.1% (+45.9)#1,870
75. Peggs 69.2% 29.8% (+39.4)#75 24.1% (+45.2)#1,914
76. Fort Cobb 69.2% 29.8% (+39.4)#76 24.1% (+45.2)#1,916
77. Spavinaw 69.2% 29.8% (+39.4)#77 24.1% (+45.2)#1,918
78. Bowring 69.0% 29.8% (+39.1)#78 24.1% (+44.9)#1,940
79. Okeene 68.5% 29.8% (+38.6)#79 24.1% (+44.4)#1,980
80. Clayton 68.0% 29.8% (+38.2)#80 24.1% (+43.9)#2,019
81. Cyril 67.7% 29.8% (+37.9)#81 24.1% (+43.7)#2,033
82. Vera 66.7% 29.8% (+36.8)#82 24.1% (+42.6)#2,109
83. Milburn 66.7% 29.8% (+36.8)#83 24.1% (+42.6)#2,143
84. Foster 66.7% 29.8% (+36.8)#84 24.1% (+42.6)#2,148
85. Bessie 66.7% 29.8% (+36.8)#85 24.1% (+42.6)#2,151
86. Pensacola 66.7% 29.8% (+36.8)#86 24.1% (+42.6)#2,198
87. Peoria 66.7% 29.8% (+36.8)#87 24.1% (+42.6)#2,200
88. Council Hill 66.7% 29.8% (+36.8)#88 24.1% (+42.6)#2,205
89. Osage 66.7% 29.8% (+36.8)#89 24.1% (+42.6)#2,206
90. Lone Grove 65.7% 29.8% (+35.8)#90 24.1% (+41.6)#2,264
91. Dewey 64.6% 29.8% (+34.8)#91 24.1% (+40.5)#2,345
92. Little Rock 64.3% 29.8% (+34.4)#92 24.1% (+40.2)#2,383
93. Yale 64.0% 29.8% (+34.2)#93 24.1% (+39.9)#2,398
94. Cameron 63.6% 29.8% (+33.8)#94 24.1% (+39.6)#2,436
95. Allen 63.4% 29.8% (+33.5)#95 24.1% (+39.3)#2,461
96. Broken Bow 63.2% 29.8% (+33.3)#96 24.1% (+39.1)#2,470
97. Sentinel 63.2% 29.8% (+33.3)#97 24.1% (+39.1)#2,475
98. Eldorado 63.2% 29.8% (+33.3)#98 24.1% (+39.1)#2,480
99. Norwood 62.9% 29.8% (+33.0)#99 24.1% (+38.8)#2,499
100. Fletcher 62.8% 29.8% (+32.9)#100 24.1% (+38.7)#2,511

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma?
Flint Creek has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma is 29.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.