Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Georgia

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Georgia
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Georgia

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Georgia Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Georgia

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Morgan 100.0% 25.2% (+74.8)#1 24.1% (+75.9)#33
2. Milstead 100.0% 25.2% (+74.8)#2 24.1% (+75.9)#140
3. Crooked Creek 100.0% 25.2% (+74.8)#3 24.1% (+75.9)#176
4. Eulonia 100.0% 25.2% (+74.8)#4 24.1% (+75.9)#217
5. Phillipsburg 100.0% 25.2% (+74.8)#5 24.1% (+75.9)#283
6. Midville 100.0% 25.2% (+74.8)#6 24.1% (+75.9)#309
7. Daisy 100.0% 25.2% (+74.8)#7 24.1% (+75.9)#356
8. Oconee 100.0% 25.2% (+74.8)#8 24.1% (+75.9)#422
9. Warthen 100.0% 25.2% (+74.8)#9 24.1% (+75.9)#654
10. Gough 100.0% 25.2% (+74.8)#10 24.1% (+75.9)#747
11. Manassas 100.0% 25.2% (+74.8)#11 24.1% (+75.9)#823
12. Ranger 100.0% 25.2% (+74.8)#12 24.1% (+75.9)#884
13. Dooling 100.0% 25.2% (+74.8)#13 24.1% (+75.9)#933
14. Garfield 95.0% 25.2% (+69.8)#14 24.1% (+70.9)#979
15. Blairsville 91.1% 25.2% (+65.9)#15 24.1% (+67.0)#1,019
16. Attapulgus 88.9% 25.2% (+63.7)#16 24.1% (+64.8)#1,058
17. Ambrose 87.5% 25.2% (+62.3)#17 24.1% (+63.4)#1,101
18. Collins 86.0% 25.2% (+60.8)#18 24.1% (+62.0)#1,133
19. Homerville 84.9% 25.2% (+59.7)#19 24.1% (+60.8)#1,169
20. Rayle 84.2% 25.2% (+59.0)#20 24.1% (+60.1)#1,187
21. Cedartown 81.6% 25.2% (+56.4)#21 24.1% (+57.5)#1,278
22. Sycamore 81.2% 25.2% (+56.1)#22 24.1% (+57.2)#1,292
23. Sale City 80.0% 25.2% (+54.8)#23 24.1% (+55.9)#1,329
24. Graham 78.6% 25.2% (+53.4)#24 24.1% (+54.5)#1,387
25. Lexington 78.4% 25.2% (+53.2)#25 24.1% (+54.3)#1,397
26. Appling 77.5% 25.2% (+52.3)#26 24.1% (+53.4)#1,447
27. Canon 77.1% 25.2% (+51.9)#27 24.1% (+53.1)#1,460
28. Flovilla 76.3% 25.2% (+51.1)#28 24.1% (+52.2)#1,507
29. Wrightsville 75.0% 25.2% (+49.8)#29 24.1% (+50.9)#1,535
30. Offerman 75.0% 25.2% (+49.8)#30 24.1% (+50.9)#1,540
31. Haralson 75.0% 25.2% (+49.8)#31 24.1% (+50.9)#1,569
32. Hull 75.0% 25.2% (+49.8)#32 24.1% (+50.9)#1,574
33. Enigma 74.7% 25.2% (+49.5)#33 24.1% (+50.6)#1,605
34. Lake Park 74.5% 25.2% (+49.3)#34 24.1% (+50.4)#1,609
35. Morganton 73.7% 25.2% (+48.5)#35 24.1% (+49.6)#1,642
36. Tallapoosa 73.6% 25.2% (+48.4)#36 24.1% (+49.6)#1,645
37. Remerton 73.3% 25.2% (+48.1)#37 24.1% (+49.3)#1,653
38. Rentz 72.7% 25.2% (+47.5)#38 24.1% (+48.7)#1,692
39. Fort Stewart 72.6% 25.2% (+47.4)#39 24.1% (+48.5)#1,699
40. Sunnyside 72.0% 25.2% (+46.8)#40 24.1% (+48.0)#1,724
41. East Ellijay 71.9% 25.2% (+46.7)#41 24.1% (+47.8)#1,733
42. Jonesboro 71.8% 25.2% (+46.6)#42 24.1% (+47.7)#1,735
43. Omega 71.6% 25.2% (+46.4)#43 24.1% (+47.6)#1,740
44. Uvalda 71.1% 25.2% (+45.9)#44 24.1% (+47.0)#1,791
45. Pearson 70.8% 25.2% (+45.6)#45 24.1% (+46.7)#1,806
46. Ellerslie 70.4% 25.2% (+45.2)#46 24.1% (+46.3)#1,833
47. Camilla 70.1% 25.2% (+44.9)#47 24.1% (+46.1)#1,845
48. Lavonia 69.8% 25.2% (+44.6)#48 24.1% (+45.8)#1,878
49. Leslie 69.7% 25.2% (+44.5)#49 24.1% (+45.6)#1,888
50. Manchester 69.2% 25.2% (+44.0)#50 24.1% (+45.2)#1,911
51. Cecil 68.4% 25.2% (+43.2)#51 24.1% (+44.3)#1,996
52. Lakeland 68.4% 25.2% (+43.2)#52 24.1% (+44.3)#2,000
53. East Griffin 68.2% 25.2% (+43.0)#53 24.1% (+44.1)#2,008
54. Claxton 67.7% 25.2% (+42.5)#54 24.1% (+43.6)#2,035
55. Hazlehurst 67.5% 25.2% (+42.3)#55 24.1% (+43.4)#2,047
56. Gillsville 66.7% 25.2% (+41.5)#56 24.1% (+42.6)#2,137
57. Denton 66.7% 25.2% (+41.5)#57 24.1% (+42.6)#2,146
58. Kite 66.7% 25.2% (+41.5)#58 24.1% (+42.6)#2,168
59. Sparta 66.5% 25.2% (+41.3)#59 24.1% (+42.4)#2,227
60. Ideal 66.0% 25.2% (+40.8)#60 24.1% (+41.9)#2,251
61. Box Springs 65.9% 25.2% (+40.7)#61 24.1% (+41.8)#2,255
62. Marshallville 65.8% 25.2% (+40.6)#62 24.1% (+41.7)#2,260
63. St Marys 65.3% 25.2% (+40.1)#63 24.1% (+41.3)#2,288
64. Woodland 64.3% 25.2% (+39.1)#64 24.1% (+40.2)#2,379
65. East Newnan 64.0% 25.2% (+38.8)#65 24.1% (+39.9)#2,399
66. Unionville 63.8% 25.2% (+38.6)#66 24.1% (+39.7)#2,415
67. Kings Bay Base 63.7% 25.2% (+38.5)#67 24.1% (+39.7)#2,421
68. Siloam 63.6% 25.2% (+38.4)#68 24.1% (+39.6)#2,433
69. Zebulon 63.5% 25.2% (+38.3)#69 24.1% (+39.4)#2,447
70. Lyons 63.4% 25.2% (+38.2)#70 24.1% (+39.3)#2,458
71. Gordon 63.1% 25.2% (+37.9)#71 24.1% (+39.0)#2,488
72. Centerville 62.9% 25.2% (+37.7)#72 24.1% (+38.8)#2,497
73. Broxton 62.8% 25.2% (+37.6)#73 24.1% (+38.7)#2,505
74. Screven 62.5% 25.2% (+37.3)#74 24.1% (+38.4)#2,541
75. Lone Oak 62.1% 25.2% (+36.9)#75 24.1% (+38.0)#2,604
76. Folkston 61.9% 25.2% (+36.7)#76 24.1% (+37.8)#2,626
77. Ellenton 61.5% 25.2% (+36.3)#77 24.1% (+37.5)#2,659
78. Danville 61.5% 25.2% (+36.3)#78 24.1% (+37.5)#2,664
79. Milledgeville 61.2% 25.2% (+36.0)#79 24.1% (+37.2)#2,688
80. Woodbury 61.2% 25.2% (+36.0)#80 24.1% (+37.1)#2,695
81. Stapleton 61.1% 25.2% (+35.9)#81 24.1% (+37.0)#2,705
82. Mountain City 60.7% 25.2% (+35.5)#82 24.1% (+36.6)#2,732
83. Fort Valley 60.4% 25.2% (+35.2)#83 24.1% (+36.3)#2,764
84. Bemiss 60.1% 25.2% (+34.9)#84 24.1% (+36.1)#2,779
85. Rochelle 60.0% 25.2% (+34.8)#85 24.1% (+35.9)#2,797
86. Oak Park 60.0% 25.2% (+34.8)#86 24.1% (+35.9)#2,813
87. Helen 60.0% 25.2% (+34.8)#87 24.1% (+35.9)#2,815
88. Blue Ridge 59.7% 25.2% (+34.5)#88 24.1% (+35.6)#2,896
89. Pelham 59.6% 25.2% (+34.4)#89 24.1% (+35.5)#2,908
90. Meigs 59.4% 25.2% (+34.2)#90 24.1% (+35.3)#2,919
91. Mcrae Helena 59.1% 25.2% (+33.9)#91 24.1% (+35.0)#2,954
92. Buchanan 59.0% 25.2% (+33.8)#92 24.1% (+34.9)#2,979
93. Chatsworth 58.7% 25.2% (+33.5)#93 24.1% (+34.6)#3,019
94. Waverly Hall 58.2% 25.2% (+33.0)#94 24.1% (+34.1)#3,069
95. Royston 57.9% 25.2% (+32.7)#95 24.1% (+33.8)#3,090
96. Gumbranch 57.9% 25.2% (+32.7)#96 24.1% (+33.8)#3,094
97. Colquitt 57.6% 25.2% (+32.4)#97 24.1% (+33.5)#3,113
98. Ludowici 57.0% 25.2% (+31.8)#98 24.1% (+33.0)#3,226
99. Talbotton 56.5% 25.2% (+31.3)#99 24.1% (+32.4)#3,289
100. Alamo 56.5% 25.2% (+31.3)#100 24.1% (+32.4)#3,292

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Georgia?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Georgia are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
95.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Georgia?
Morgan has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Georgia with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of Georgia?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Georgia is 25.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.