Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Mississippi

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Mississippi
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Mississippi

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Mississippi Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Mississippi

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Arnold Line 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#1 24.1% (+75.9)#34
2. Collinsville 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#2 24.1% (+75.9)#35
3. Tucker 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#3 24.1% (+75.9)#353
4. Ethel 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#4 24.1% (+75.9)#360
5. Harperville 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#5 24.1% (+75.9)#382
6. De Soto 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#6 24.1% (+75.9)#452
7. Georgetown 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#7 24.1% (+75.9)#472
8. Taylor 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#8 24.1% (+75.9)#488
9. Alligator 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#9 24.1% (+75.9)#495
10. Hamilton 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#10 24.1% (+75.9)#514
11. Bond 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#12 24.1% (+75.9)#520
12. Glen Allan 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#13 24.1% (+75.9)#521
13. Bethlehem 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#14 24.1% (+75.9)#529
14. Doddsville 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#15 24.1% (+75.9)#577
15. Walthall 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#16 24.1% (+75.9)#705
16. Winterville 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#17 24.1% (+75.9)#769
17. Satartia 100.0% 34.9% (+65.1)#18 24.1% (+75.9)#927
18. Conehatta 97.6% 34.9% (+62.7)#19 24.1% (+73.5)#972
19. White Oak 93.1% 34.9% (+58.1)#20 24.1% (+69.0)#999
20. Puckett 91.7% 34.9% (+56.7)#21 24.1% (+67.6)#1,011
21. Glendale 90.9% 34.9% (+56.0)#22 24.1% (+66.8)#1,022
22. Silver Creek 88.9% 34.9% (+54.0)#23 24.1% (+64.8)#1,070
23. North Carrollton 87.0% 34.9% (+52.0)#24 24.1% (+62.9)#1,109
24. Glendora 83.3% 34.9% (+48.4)#25 24.1% (+59.3)#1,228
25. Gloster 82.4% 34.9% (+47.5)#26 24.1% (+58.3)#1,247
26. Pearlington 80.6% 34.9% (+45.7)#27 24.1% (+56.6)#1,307
27. Benoit 80.0% 34.9% (+45.1)#28 24.1% (+55.9)#1,323
28. Potts Camp 79.5% 34.9% (+44.6)#29 24.1% (+55.4)#1,363
29. Crosby 78.6% 34.9% (+43.7)#30 24.1% (+54.5)#1,392
30. Mantee 76.5% 34.9% (+41.5)#31 24.1% (+52.4)#1,494
31. Union 75.6% 34.9% (+40.7)#32 24.1% (+51.5)#1,522
32. New Augusta 75.4% 34.9% (+40.5)#33 24.1% (+51.3)#1,530
33. Arcola 73.7% 34.9% (+38.8)#34 24.1% (+49.6)#1,644
34. Gunnison 73.4% 34.9% (+38.5)#35 24.1% (+49.3)#1,650
35. Renova 73.3% 34.9% (+38.3)#36 24.1% (+49.2)#1,661
36. Port Gibson 73.2% 34.9% (+38.3)#37 24.1% (+49.1)#1,664
37. Anguilla 73.0% 34.9% (+38.1)#38 24.1% (+48.9)#1,671
38. Plantersville 72.9% 34.9% (+37.9)#39 24.1% (+48.8)#1,676
39. Ripley 71.1% 34.9% (+36.2)#40 24.1% (+47.0)#1,789
40. New Houlka 70.6% 34.9% (+35.7)#41 24.1% (+46.5)#1,821
41. Big Creek 70.0% 34.9% (+35.1)#42 24.1% (+45.9)#1,869
42. Burnsville 69.8% 34.9% (+34.9)#43 24.1% (+45.7)#1,881
43. Mount Olive 68.8% 34.9% (+33.9)#44 24.1% (+44.7)#1,951
44. Rosedale 68.8% 34.9% (+33.9)#45 24.1% (+44.7)#1,954
45. Sandersville 68.6% 34.9% (+33.7)#46 24.1% (+44.5)#1,975
46. Friars Point 68.3% 34.9% (+33.3)#47 24.1% (+44.2)#2,006
47. Lucedale 68.2% 34.9% (+33.3)#48 24.1% (+44.2)#2,007
48. Jonestown 68.2% 34.9% (+33.3)#49 24.1% (+44.1)#2,009
49. Forest 67.5% 34.9% (+32.6)#50 24.1% (+43.4)#2,049
50. Newton 67.4% 34.9% (+32.5)#51 24.1% (+43.3)#2,056
51. Sturgis 66.7% 34.9% (+31.7)#52 24.1% (+42.6)#2,176
52. Slate Springs 66.7% 34.9% (+31.7)#53 24.1% (+42.6)#2,214
53. Sunflower 65.2% 34.9% (+30.3)#54 24.1% (+41.1)#2,299
54. Quitman 64.9% 34.9% (+30.0)#55 24.1% (+40.8)#2,322
55. Walls 64.7% 34.9% (+29.8)#56 24.1% (+40.7)#2,331
56. Vaiden 64.7% 34.9% (+29.8)#57 24.1% (+40.6)#2,337
57. Decatur 64.7% 34.9% (+29.7)#58 24.1% (+40.6)#2,343
58. Isola 63.6% 34.9% (+28.7)#59 24.1% (+39.6)#2,426
59. Scooba 63.5% 34.9% (+28.5)#60 24.1% (+39.4)#2,448
60. Wade 63.4% 34.9% (+28.5)#61 24.1% (+39.3)#2,452
61. Artesia 62.9% 34.9% (+28.0)#62 24.1% (+38.8)#2,495
62. Fayette 62.3% 34.9% (+27.4)#63 24.1% (+38.2)#2,582
63. Crowder 61.5% 34.9% (+26.6)#64 24.1% (+37.5)#2,653
64. Wesson 61.2% 34.9% (+26.3)#65 24.1% (+37.1)#2,691
65. Macon 60.6% 34.9% (+25.7)#66 24.1% (+36.6)#2,739
66. West Hattiesburg 60.5% 34.9% (+25.6)#67 24.1% (+36.4)#2,750
67. Winstonville 60.0% 34.9% (+25.1)#68 24.1% (+35.9)#2,878
68. Eden 59.3% 34.9% (+24.3)#69 24.1% (+35.2)#2,944
69. Walnut 58.8% 34.9% (+23.9)#70 24.1% (+34.7)#2,993
70. Foxworth 58.5% 34.9% (+23.6)#71 24.1% (+34.5)#3,030
71. Bude 58.5% 34.9% (+23.6)#72 24.1% (+34.4)#3,032
72. Louisville 58.0% 34.9% (+23.1)#73 24.1% (+34.0)#3,083
73. Okolona 57.3% 34.9% (+22.4)#74 24.1% (+33.2)#3,143
74. Magnolia 57.1% 34.9% (+22.2)#75 24.1% (+33.1)#3,150
75. Redwater 57.1% 34.9% (+22.2)#76 24.1% (+33.1)#3,168
76. Osyka 57.1% 34.9% (+22.2)#77 24.1% (+33.1)#3,177
77. Hickory Flat 56.9% 34.9% (+21.9)#78 24.1% (+32.8)#3,243
78. Sherman 56.8% 34.9% (+21.8)#79 24.1% (+32.7)#3,256
79. Flora 56.6% 34.9% (+21.7)#80 24.1% (+32.5)#3,272
80. Laurel 56.4% 34.9% (+21.5)#81 24.1% (+32.3)#3,303
81. Shaw 56.0% 34.9% (+21.1)#82 24.1% (+32.0)#3,347
82. Morgan City 56.0% 34.9% (+21.1)#83 24.1% (+31.9)#3,355
83. Durant 55.9% 34.9% (+21.0)#84 24.1% (+31.8)#3,359
84. Moorhead 55.8% 34.9% (+20.9)#85 24.1% (+31.8)#3,366
85. Meadville 55.6% 34.9% (+20.6)#86 24.1% (+31.5)#3,397
86. Braxton 55.6% 34.9% (+20.6)#87 24.1% (+31.5)#3,414
87. Sallis 55.6% 34.9% (+20.6)#88 24.1% (+31.5)#3,419
88. Verona 55.2% 34.9% (+20.3)#89 24.1% (+31.1)#3,453
89. Goodman 54.7% 34.9% (+19.8)#90 24.1% (+30.7)#3,508
90. Prentiss 54.7% 34.9% (+19.8)#91 24.1% (+30.6)#3,509
91. Beechwood 54.4% 34.9% (+19.5)#92 24.1% (+30.3)#3,561
92. Kosciusko 54.4% 34.9% (+19.5)#93 24.1% (+30.3)#3,562
93. D Lo 54.2% 34.9% (+19.2)#94 24.1% (+30.1)#3,592
94. Winona 54.1% 34.9% (+19.2)#95 24.1% (+30.0)#3,608
95. Pascagoula 54.0% 34.9% (+19.1)#96 24.1% (+29.9)#3,617
96. Taylorsville 53.9% 34.9% (+19.0)#97 24.1% (+29.8)#3,632
97. Weir 53.7% 34.9% (+18.8)#98 24.1% (+29.6)#3,665
98. Como 53.4% 34.9% (+18.5)#99 24.1% (+29.3)#3,702
99. Eupora 53.4% 34.9% (+18.5)#100 24.1% (+29.3)#3,705
100. Monticello 53.2% 34.9% (+18.3)#101 24.1% (+29.2)#3,734

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Mississippi?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Mississippi are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Mississippi?
Arnold Line has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Mississippi with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of Mississippi?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Mississippi is 34.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.