Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Minnesota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Minnesota

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Woodland 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#1 24.1% (+75.9)#219
2. Wykoff 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#2 24.1% (+75.9)#342
3. Chandler 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#3 24.1% (+75.9)#365
4. Bigfork 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#4 24.1% (+75.9)#369
5. Lake Lillian 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#5 24.1% (+75.9)#573
6. Boyd 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#6 24.1% (+75.9)#598
7. Marietta 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#7 24.1% (+75.9)#601
8. South Haven 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#8 24.1% (+75.9)#620
9. Warba 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#9 24.1% (+75.9)#651
10. Clements 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#10 24.1% (+75.9)#681
11. Millerville 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#11 24.1% (+75.9)#752
12. Viking 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#12 24.1% (+75.9)#780
13. Garvin 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#13 24.1% (+75.9)#790
14. Sunburg 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#14 24.1% (+75.9)#807
15. Nielsville 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#15 24.1% (+75.9)#813
16. Beltrami 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#16 24.1% (+75.9)#831
17. Walters 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#17 24.1% (+75.9)#845
18. Evan 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#18 24.1% (+75.9)#850
19. Trosky 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#19 24.1% (+75.9)#858
20. Kenneth 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#20 24.1% (+75.9)#865
21. St Vincent 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#21 24.1% (+75.9)#930
22. Wilder 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#22 24.1% (+75.9)#931
23. Correll 100.0% 19.9% (+80.1)#23 24.1% (+75.9)#963
24. Ball Club 93.9% 19.9% (+74.1)#24 24.1% (+69.9)#989
25. Wabasso 93.8% 19.9% (+73.9)#25 24.1% (+69.7)#992
26. Herman 85.7% 19.9% (+65.9)#26 24.1% (+61.6)#1,143
27. Miltona 84.6% 19.9% (+64.8)#27 24.1% (+60.5)#1,176
28. Bena 83.3% 19.9% (+63.5)#28 24.1% (+59.3)#1,227
29. Inger 81.2% 19.9% (+61.4)#29 24.1% (+57.2)#1,298
30. Mahnomen 80.8% 19.9% (+60.9)#30 24.1% (+56.7)#1,305
31. Foxhome 77.8% 19.9% (+57.9)#31 24.1% (+53.7)#1,442
32. Verndale 76.0% 19.9% (+56.1)#32 24.1% (+51.9)#1,512
33. Keewatin 75.4% 19.9% (+55.5)#33 24.1% (+51.3)#1,532
34. Staples 74.1% 19.9% (+54.2)#34 24.1% (+50.0)#1,616
35. Dent 73.9% 19.9% (+54.1)#35 24.1% (+49.8)#1,626
36. Pelican Rapids 72.9% 19.9% (+53.0)#36 24.1% (+48.8)#1,675
37. Brooten 72.7% 19.9% (+52.9)#37 24.1% (+48.7)#1,680
38. Lynd 72.7% 19.9% (+52.9)#38 24.1% (+48.7)#1,682
39. Twin Lakes 72.7% 19.9% (+52.9)#39 24.1% (+48.7)#1,693
40. Tamarack 71.4% 19.9% (+51.6)#40 24.1% (+47.4)#1,777
41. Cosmos 70.8% 19.9% (+51.0)#41 24.1% (+46.8)#1,804
42. Warroad 70.1% 19.9% (+50.2)#42 24.1% (+46.0)#1,846
43. Ebro 70.0% 19.9% (+50.1)#43 24.1% (+45.9)#1,872
44. Garden City 69.2% 19.9% (+49.4)#44 24.1% (+45.2)#1,924
45. Kenyon 68.9% 19.9% (+49.1)#45 24.1% (+44.9)#1,941
46. Sherburn 68.0% 19.9% (+48.1)#46 24.1% (+43.9)#2,018
47. Riverland 67.3% 19.9% (+47.4)#47 24.1% (+43.2)#2,060
48. Evansville 66.7% 19.9% (+46.8)#48 24.1% (+42.6)#2,097
49. Ivanhoe 66.7% 19.9% (+46.8)#49 24.1% (+42.6)#2,099
50. Kandiyohi 66.7% 19.9% (+46.8)#50 24.1% (+42.6)#2,110
51. Vergas 66.7% 19.9% (+46.8)#51 24.1% (+42.6)#2,153
52. Okabena 66.7% 19.9% (+46.8)#52 24.1% (+42.6)#2,175
53. Harding 66.7% 19.9% (+46.8)#53 24.1% (+42.6)#2,191
54. Wright 66.7% 19.9% (+46.8)#54 24.1% (+42.6)#2,199
55. West Union 66.7% 19.9% (+46.8)#55 24.1% (+42.6)#2,211
56. Halma 66.7% 19.9% (+46.8)#56 24.1% (+42.6)#2,224
57. White Earth 66.2% 19.9% (+46.4)#57 24.1% (+42.2)#2,237
58. Blackduck 65.5% 19.9% (+45.7)#58 24.1% (+41.4)#2,276
59. St Martin 64.7% 19.9% (+44.9)#59 24.1% (+40.6)#2,340
60. Ada 64.5% 19.9% (+44.7)#60 24.1% (+40.4)#2,351
61. Pipestone 64.3% 19.9% (+44.5)#61 24.1% (+40.3)#2,366
62. Barnum 62.5% 19.9% (+42.6)#62 24.1% (+38.4)#2,548
63. Wilton 62.5% 19.9% (+42.6)#63 24.1% (+38.4)#2,567
64. Remer 62.1% 19.9% (+42.2)#64 24.1% (+38.0)#2,602
65. Jeffers 61.9% 19.9% (+42.1)#65 24.1% (+37.8)#2,622
66. Waltham 61.5% 19.9% (+41.7)#66 24.1% (+37.5)#2,663
67. Hallock 60.0% 19.9% (+40.1)#67 24.1% (+35.9)#2,801
68. Fisher 60.0% 19.9% (+40.1)#68 24.1% (+35.9)#2,825
69. Alvarado 60.0% 19.9% (+40.1)#69 24.1% (+35.9)#2,837
70. Granada 60.0% 19.9% (+40.1)#70 24.1% (+35.9)#2,848
71. Borup 60.0% 19.9% (+40.1)#71 24.1% (+35.9)#2,865
72. Mckinley 60.0% 19.9% (+40.1)#72 24.1% (+35.9)#2,880
73. Holland 58.3% 19.9% (+38.5)#73 24.1% (+34.3)#3,057
74. Odin 58.3% 19.9% (+38.5)#74 24.1% (+34.3)#3,065
75. Mcgregor 57.4% 19.9% (+37.6)#75 24.1% (+33.4)#3,129
76. Willernie 57.1% 19.9% (+37.3)#76 24.1% (+33.1)#3,173
77. Badger 57.1% 19.9% (+37.3)#77 24.1% (+33.1)#3,174
78. Emmons 57.1% 19.9% (+37.3)#78 24.1% (+33.1)#3,190
79. Gilbert 56.4% 19.9% (+36.6)#79 24.1% (+32.4)#3,296
80. Wendell 56.2% 19.9% (+36.4)#80 24.1% (+32.2)#3,327
81. Blue Earth 55.8% 19.9% (+36.0)#81 24.1% (+31.8)#3,365
82. Bruno 55.6% 19.9% (+35.7)#82 24.1% (+31.5)#3,427
83. Naytahwaush 55.2% 19.9% (+35.3)#83 24.1% (+31.1)#3,458
84. Coleraine 55.0% 19.9% (+35.1)#84 24.1% (+30.9)#3,479
85. Kasota 53.8% 19.9% (+34.0)#85 24.1% (+29.8)#3,644
86. Claremont 53.8% 19.9% (+34.0)#86 24.1% (+29.8)#3,647
87. Onamia 53.6% 19.9% (+33.7)#87 24.1% (+29.5)#3,683
88. Karlstad 53.6% 19.9% (+33.7)#88 24.1% (+29.5)#3,686
89. Eagle Bend 53.0% 19.9% (+33.2)#89 24.1% (+29.0)#3,763
90. Erskine 52.4% 19.9% (+32.5)#90 24.1% (+28.3)#3,858
91. Windom 52.3% 19.9% (+32.5)#91 24.1% (+28.2)#3,868
92. Grand Marais 52.2% 19.9% (+32.3)#92 24.1% (+28.1)#3,885
93. Kerkhoven 52.1% 19.9% (+32.2)#93 24.1% (+28.0)#3,903
94. Deer River 51.7% 19.9% (+31.8)#94 24.1% (+27.6)#3,963
95. Fairfax 51.4% 19.9% (+31.5)#95 24.1% (+27.3)#4,000
96. Waite Park 50.2% 19.9% (+30.3)#96 24.1% (+26.1)#4,119
97. Lamberton 50.0% 19.9% (+30.1)#97 24.1% (+25.9)#4,171
98. Sacred Heart 50.0% 19.9% (+30.1)#98 24.1% (+25.9)#4,204
99. Hampton 50.0% 19.9% (+30.1)#99 24.1% (+25.9)#4,210
100. Prinsburg 50.0% 19.9% (+30.1)#100 24.1% (+25.9)#4,229

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Minnesota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Minnesota?
Woodland has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Minnesota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of Minnesota?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Minnesota is 19.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.