Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Wisconsin

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Wisconsin

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Ashippun 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#1 24.1% (+75.9)#112
2. Lake Sherwood 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#2 24.1% (+75.9)#351
3. Kellnersville 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#3 24.1% (+75.9)#480
4. Woodman 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#4 24.1% (+75.9)#540
5. Nelsonville 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#5 24.1% (+75.9)#615
6. Sayner 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#6 24.1% (+75.9)#637
7. Zoar 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#7 24.1% (+75.9)#666
8. Greenbush 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#8 24.1% (+75.9)#697
9. Pulcifer 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#9 24.1% (+75.9)#706
10. Pine River 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#10 24.1% (+75.9)#714
11. Lublin 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#11 24.1% (+75.9)#771
12. Big Foot Prairie 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#12 24.1% (+75.9)#782
13. Townsend 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#14 24.1% (+75.9)#810
14. Barronett 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#15 24.1% (+75.9)#812
15. Conrath 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#16 24.1% (+75.9)#829
16. Springbrook 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#17 24.1% (+75.9)#842
17. Paac Ciinak 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#18 24.1% (+75.9)#864
18. Leopolis 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#19 24.1% (+75.9)#906
19. Rockdale 88.9% 22.6% (+66.3)#20 24.1% (+64.8)#1,072
20. Aniwa 87.5% 22.6% (+64.9)#21 24.1% (+63.4)#1,099
21. Sister Bay 84.8% 22.6% (+62.2)#22 24.1% (+60.8)#1,172
22. Birch Hill 83.3% 22.6% (+60.7)#23 24.1% (+59.3)#1,218
23. Boaz 83.3% 22.6% (+60.7)#24 24.1% (+59.3)#1,229
24. Amberg 77.8% 22.6% (+55.2)#25 24.1% (+53.7)#1,441
25. Rudolph 75.0% 22.6% (+52.4)#26 24.1% (+50.9)#1,550
26. Unity 75.0% 22.6% (+52.4)#27 24.1% (+50.9)#1,553
27. Ogdensburg 75.0% 22.6% (+52.4)#28 24.1% (+50.9)#1,582
28. Cashton 74.0% 22.6% (+51.4)#29 24.1% (+49.9)#1,621
29. New Post 72.0% 22.6% (+49.4)#30 24.1% (+47.9)#1,729
30. Waterloo 69.7% 22.6% (+47.0)#31 24.1% (+45.6)#1,890
31. Elkhart Lake 69.6% 22.6% (+46.9)#32 24.1% (+45.5)#1,893
32. Granton 69.6% 22.6% (+46.9)#33 24.1% (+45.5)#1,895
33. Lake Tomahawk 68.0% 22.6% (+45.4)#34 24.1% (+43.9)#2,024
34. North Freedom 67.7% 22.6% (+45.1)#35 24.1% (+43.7)#2,034
35. Brandon 66.7% 22.6% (+44.0)#36 24.1% (+42.6)#2,091
36. Hancock 66.7% 22.6% (+44.0)#37 24.1% (+42.6)#2,116
37. Lowell 66.7% 22.6% (+44.0)#38 24.1% (+42.6)#2,141
38. Ridgeland 66.7% 22.6% (+44.0)#39 24.1% (+42.6)#2,149
39. Eland 66.7% 22.6% (+44.0)#40 24.1% (+42.6)#2,152
40. Westboro 66.7% 22.6% (+44.0)#41 24.1% (+42.6)#2,155
41. Dalton 66.7% 22.6% (+44.0)#42 24.1% (+42.6)#2,163
42. Deer Park 66.7% 22.6% (+44.0)#43 24.1% (+42.6)#2,164
43. Chelsea 66.7% 22.6% (+44.0)#44 24.1% (+42.6)#2,208
44. Summit Lake 66.7% 22.6% (+44.0)#45 24.1% (+42.6)#2,218
45. Cumberland 65.9% 22.6% (+43.3)#46 24.1% (+41.8)#2,256
46. Algoma 63.6% 22.6% (+41.0)#47 24.1% (+39.6)#2,424
47. Park Falls 63.5% 22.6% (+40.9)#48 24.1% (+39.4)#2,446
48. Norwalk 63.2% 22.6% (+40.5)#49 24.1% (+39.1)#2,477
49. Bancroft 62.9% 22.6% (+40.2)#50 24.1% (+38.8)#2,502
50. Elcho 62.5% 22.6% (+39.9)#51 24.1% (+38.4)#2,570
51. Union Grove 62.2% 22.6% (+39.5)#52 24.1% (+38.1)#2,591
52. Osceola 61.9% 22.6% (+39.2)#53 24.1% (+37.8)#2,625
53. Abrams 61.5% 22.6% (+38.9)#54 24.1% (+37.5)#2,660
54. Ashland 60.8% 22.6% (+38.2)#55 24.1% (+36.7)#2,728
55. Abbotsford 60.8% 22.6% (+38.2)#56 24.1% (+36.7)#2,729
56. Suring 60.0% 22.6% (+37.4)#57 24.1% (+35.9)#2,824
57. White Lake 60.0% 22.6% (+37.4)#58 24.1% (+35.9)#2,844
58. Cazenovia 60.0% 22.6% (+37.4)#59 24.1% (+35.9)#2,846
59. Forestville 57.1% 22.6% (+34.5)#60 24.1% (+33.1)#3,165
60. Juda 57.1% 22.6% (+34.5)#61 24.1% (+33.1)#3,184
61. Ceex Haci 57.1% 22.6% (+34.5)#62 24.1% (+33.1)#3,220
62. Prairie Du Sac 56.8% 22.6% (+34.2)#63 24.1% (+32.7)#3,250
63. Iron River 56.5% 22.6% (+33.9)#64 24.1% (+32.4)#3,279
64. Fontana On Geneva Lake 56.0% 22.6% (+33.4)#65 24.1% (+31.9)#3,349
65. Milltown 55.8% 22.6% (+33.2)#66 24.1% (+31.7)#3,368
66. Taylor 55.6% 22.6% (+32.9)#67 24.1% (+31.5)#3,409
67. Winter 55.6% 22.6% (+32.9)#68 24.1% (+31.5)#3,411
68. New Lisbon 55.4% 22.6% (+32.8)#69 24.1% (+31.3)#3,438
69. Wausaukee 55.4% 22.6% (+32.7)#70 24.1% (+31.3)#3,441
70. Chetek 54.3% 22.6% (+31.7)#71 24.1% (+30.3)#3,566
71. Neshkoro 54.2% 22.6% (+31.5)#72 24.1% (+30.1)#3,593
72. North Fond Du Lac 53.9% 22.6% (+31.3)#73 24.1% (+29.9)#3,629
73. Tainter Lake 53.6% 22.6% (+30.9)#74 24.1% (+29.5)#3,681
74. Centuria 53.6% 22.6% (+30.9)#75 24.1% (+29.5)#3,682
75. Plain 53.3% 22.6% (+30.7)#76 24.1% (+29.3)#3,713
76. Gresham 52.9% 22.6% (+30.3)#77 24.1% (+28.9)#3,782
77. Juneau 52.8% 22.6% (+30.2)#78 24.1% (+28.7)#3,804
78. Wabeno 52.4% 22.6% (+29.8)#79 24.1% (+28.3)#3,860
79. Kewaunee 52.0% 22.6% (+29.3)#80 24.1% (+27.9)#3,916
80. Lac Du Flambeau 50.9% 22.6% (+28.2)#81 24.1% (+26.8)#4,055
81. Hammond 50.0% 22.6% (+27.4)#82 24.1% (+25.9)#4,131
82. Viola 50.0% 22.6% (+27.4)#83 24.1% (+25.9)#4,218
83. Arkansaw 50.0% 22.6% (+27.4)#84 24.1% (+25.9)#4,265
84. Ironton 50.0% 22.6% (+27.4)#85 24.1% (+25.9)#4,291
85. Lake Lorraine 50.0% 22.6% (+27.4)#86 24.1% (+25.9)#4,301
86. Wheeler 50.0% 22.6% (+27.4)#87 24.1% (+25.9)#4,339
87. Tony 50.0% 22.6% (+27.4)#88 24.1% (+25.9)#4,414
88. Pence 50.0% 22.6% (+27.4)#89 24.1% (+25.9)#4,419
89. Fox Lake 48.1% 22.6% (+25.5)#90 24.1% (+24.1)#4,680
90. Kiel 48.1% 22.6% (+25.4)#91 24.1% (+24.0)#4,705
91. Fremont 47.8% 22.6% (+25.2)#92 24.1% (+23.7)#4,746
92. Laona 47.8% 22.6% (+25.2)#93 24.1% (+23.7)#4,748
93. Oxford 47.8% 22.6% (+25.2)#94 24.1% (+23.7)#4,749
94. Boscobel 47.4% 22.6% (+24.8)#95 24.1% (+23.3)#4,821
95. Rock Springs 47.4% 22.6% (+24.7)#96 24.1% (+23.3)#4,839
96. Allenton 46.9% 22.6% (+24.3)#97 24.1% (+22.8)#4,928
97. Cobb 46.7% 22.6% (+24.0)#98 24.1% (+22.6)#4,964
98. Birnamwood 46.2% 22.6% (+23.5)#99 24.1% (+22.1)#5,038
99. Francis Creek 46.2% 22.6% (+23.5)#100 24.1% (+22.1)#5,039
100. Rockland 46.2% 22.6% (+23.5)#101 24.1% (+22.1)#5,041

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Wisconsin are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Wisconsin?
Ashippun has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Wisconsin with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of Wisconsin?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Wisconsin is 22.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.