Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Arkansas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Arkansas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Arkansas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Arkansas Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Arkansas

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Enola 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#1 24.1% (+75.9)#198
2. Lacey 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#2 24.1% (+75.9)#220
3. Vanndale 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#3 24.1% (+75.9)#236
4. Yarborough Landing 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#4 24.1% (+75.9)#326
5. Oden 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#5 24.1% (+75.9)#383
6. Delight 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#6 24.1% (+75.9)#469
7. Sherrill 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#7 24.1% (+75.9)#584
8. Banks 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#8 24.1% (+75.9)#606
9. Fisher 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#9 24.1% (+75.9)#617
10. Hindsville 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#10 24.1% (+75.9)#735
11. Tucker 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#11 24.1% (+75.9)#781
12. Delaplaine 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#12 24.1% (+75.9)#799
13. Peach Orchard 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#13 24.1% (+75.9)#832
14. Jerome 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#14 24.1% (+75.9)#839
15. Beedeville 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#15 24.1% (+75.9)#862
16. Patmos 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#16 24.1% (+75.9)#866
17. Big Flat 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#17 24.1% (+75.9)#870
18. Anthonyville 100.0% 30.8% (+69.2)#18 24.1% (+75.9)#875
19. Holly Grove 90.9% 30.8% (+60.1)#19 24.1% (+66.8)#1,024
20. Carthage 90.0% 30.8% (+59.2)#20 24.1% (+65.9)#1,044
21. Batavia 88.5% 30.8% (+57.7)#21 24.1% (+64.4)#1,078
22. Shirley 87.5% 30.8% (+56.7)#22 24.1% (+63.4)#1,097
23. Pangburn 86.7% 30.8% (+55.9)#23 24.1% (+62.6)#1,114
24. Lynn 85.7% 30.8% (+54.9)#24 24.1% (+61.6)#1,151
25. Mcalmont 85.6% 30.8% (+54.8)#25 24.1% (+61.5)#1,158
26. Bearden 83.8% 30.8% (+53.0)#26 24.1% (+59.8)#1,192
27. Colt 82.1% 30.8% (+51.3)#27 24.1% (+58.0)#1,259
28. London 82.0% 30.8% (+51.2)#28 24.1% (+57.9)#1,261
29. Bonanza 80.0% 30.8% (+49.2)#29 24.1% (+55.9)#1,325
30. Chidester 80.0% 30.8% (+49.2)#30 24.1% (+55.9)#1,330
31. Oil Trough 80.0% 30.8% (+49.2)#31 24.1% (+55.9)#1,336
32. Perla 80.0% 30.8% (+49.2)#32 24.1% (+55.9)#1,339
33. West Point 80.0% 30.8% (+49.2)#33 24.1% (+55.9)#1,350
34. Zinc 80.0% 30.8% (+49.2)#34 24.1% (+55.9)#1,356
35. Lamar 79.3% 30.8% (+48.5)#35 24.1% (+55.2)#1,366
36. Hickory Ridge 78.3% 30.8% (+47.5)#36 24.1% (+54.2)#1,402
37. Sunset 77.8% 30.8% (+47.0)#37 24.1% (+53.7)#1,440
38. Russell 77.4% 30.8% (+46.6)#38 24.1% (+53.3)#1,451
39. Patterson 76.9% 30.8% (+46.1)#39 24.1% (+52.8)#1,476
40. Thornton 76.5% 30.8% (+45.7)#40 24.1% (+52.4)#1,495
41. Dyess 76.5% 30.8% (+45.7)#41 24.1% (+52.4)#1,502
42. Swifton 76.3% 30.8% (+45.5)#42 24.1% (+52.2)#1,506
43. Gosnell 76.2% 30.8% (+45.4)#43 24.1% (+52.1)#1,509
44. Pollard 75.0% 30.8% (+44.2)#44 24.1% (+50.9)#1,575
45. Rison 74.4% 30.8% (+43.6)#45 24.1% (+50.3)#1,611
46. Dermott 74.0% 30.8% (+43.2)#46 24.1% (+50.0)#1,619
47. Manila 73.8% 30.8% (+43.0)#47 24.1% (+49.8)#1,627
48. Joiner 73.2% 30.8% (+42.4)#48 24.1% (+49.1)#1,662
49. Rockwell 73.1% 30.8% (+42.3)#49 24.1% (+49.0)#1,666
50. Beaver 71.4% 30.8% (+40.6)#50 24.1% (+47.4)#1,775
51. Smithville 71.4% 30.8% (+40.6)#51 24.1% (+47.4)#1,776
52. Emerson 70.8% 30.8% (+40.0)#52 24.1% (+46.8)#1,805
53. Franklin 70.0% 30.8% (+39.2)#53 24.1% (+45.9)#1,865
54. Brinkley 69.9% 30.8% (+39.1)#54 24.1% (+45.9)#1,874
55. Caraway 69.6% 30.8% (+38.8)#55 24.1% (+45.6)#1,892
56. Cotton Plant 69.2% 30.8% (+38.4)#56 24.1% (+45.2)#1,917
57. Cave City 69.1% 30.8% (+38.3)#57 24.1% (+45.0)#1,936
58. Lockesburg 68.5% 30.8% (+37.7)#58 24.1% (+44.4)#1,981
59. Hartford 68.4% 30.8% (+37.6)#59 24.1% (+44.3)#1,994
60. North Crossett 67.0% 30.8% (+36.2)#60 24.1% (+42.9)#2,070
61. Black Oak 66.7% 30.8% (+35.9)#61 24.1% (+42.6)#2,162
62. Ogden 66.7% 30.8% (+35.9)#62 24.1% (+42.6)#2,174
63. Pleasant Plains 66.7% 30.8% (+35.9)#63 24.1% (+42.6)#2,181
64. Washington 66.7% 30.8% (+35.9)#64 24.1% (+42.6)#2,202
65. Judsonia 65.9% 30.8% (+35.1)#65 24.1% (+41.9)#2,252
66. Leachville 64.8% 30.8% (+34.0)#66 24.1% (+40.7)#2,328
67. Wickes 64.3% 30.8% (+33.5)#67 24.1% (+40.2)#2,369
68. Norfork 63.5% 30.8% (+32.7)#68 24.1% (+39.4)#2,449
69. Bellefonte 63.4% 30.8% (+32.6)#69 24.1% (+39.3)#2,456
70. Gould 63.0% 30.8% (+32.2)#70 24.1% (+39.0)#2,491
71. Marked Tree 62.8% 30.8% (+32.0)#71 24.1% (+38.7)#2,509
72. Waldron 62.1% 30.8% (+31.3)#72 24.1% (+38.0)#2,598
73. Coal Hill 61.1% 30.8% (+30.3)#73 24.1% (+37.0)#2,703
74. Diaz 60.5% 30.8% (+29.7)#74 24.1% (+36.4)#2,753
75. Magnolia 60.1% 30.8% (+29.3)#75 24.1% (+36.0)#2,781
76. Lakeview 60.0% 30.8% (+29.2)#76 24.1% (+35.9)#2,798
77. Knoxville 60.0% 30.8% (+29.2)#77 24.1% (+35.9)#2,804
78. Denning 60.0% 30.8% (+29.2)#78 24.1% (+35.9)#2,838
79. Garland 60.0% 30.8% (+29.2)#79 24.1% (+35.9)#2,840
80. Greenway 60.0% 30.8% (+29.2)#80 24.1% (+35.9)#2,858
81. Ratcliff 60.0% 30.8% (+29.2)#81 24.1% (+35.9)#2,870
82. Sedgwick 60.0% 30.8% (+29.2)#82 24.1% (+35.9)#2,871
83. St Paul 60.0% 30.8% (+29.2)#83 24.1% (+35.9)#2,874
84. Mountain Pine 58.9% 30.8% (+28.1)#84 24.1% (+34.9)#2,983
85. Helena West Helena 58.1% 30.8% (+27.3)#85 24.1% (+34.0)#3,078
86. Mcgehee 57.4% 30.8% (+26.6)#86 24.1% (+33.4)#3,130
87. Mcneil 57.1% 30.8% (+26.3)#87 24.1% (+33.1)#3,171
88. Blue Mountain 57.1% 30.8% (+26.3)#88 24.1% (+33.1)#3,211
89. Haynes 57.1% 30.8% (+26.3)#89 24.1% (+33.1)#3,215
90. Flippin 57.0% 30.8% (+26.2)#90 24.1% (+32.9)#3,228
91. Bradford 56.9% 30.8% (+26.1)#91 24.1% (+32.8)#3,237
92. Paris 56.8% 30.8% (+26.0)#92 24.1% (+32.7)#3,251
93. Decatur 56.5% 30.8% (+25.7)#93 24.1% (+32.4)#3,276
94. Huntington 56.5% 30.8% (+25.7)#94 24.1% (+32.4)#3,283
95. Alexander 55.7% 30.8% (+24.9)#95 24.1% (+31.7)#3,375
96. Mansfield 55.0% 30.8% (+24.2)#96 24.1% (+30.9)#3,481
97. Quitman 55.0% 30.8% (+24.2)#97 24.1% (+30.9)#3,484
98. Branch 54.5% 30.8% (+23.7)#98 24.1% (+30.5)#3,545
99. Humphrey 54.5% 30.8% (+23.7)#99 24.1% (+30.5)#3,552
100. Houston 54.5% 30.8% (+23.7)#100 24.1% (+30.5)#3,555

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Arkansas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Arkansas are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Arkansas?
Enola has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Arkansas with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of Arkansas?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Arkansas is 30.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.