Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Iowa

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Iowa

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Ocheyedan 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#1 24.1% (+75.9)#216
2. Mooar 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#2 24.1% (+75.9)#458
3. Holland 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#3 24.1% (+75.9)#465
4. Mallard 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#4 24.1% (+75.9)#487
5. Burr Oak 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#5 24.1% (+75.9)#516
6. Harris 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#6 24.1% (+75.9)#589
7. Havelock 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#7 24.1% (+75.9)#612
8. Delaware 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#8 24.1% (+75.9)#687
9. Boxholm 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#9 24.1% (+75.9)#695
10. Panorama Park 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#10 24.1% (+75.9)#699
11. Exline 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#11 24.1% (+75.9)#716
12. Springbrook 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#12 24.1% (+75.9)#719
13. Andover 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#13 24.1% (+75.9)#729
14. Turin 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#14 24.1% (+75.9)#737
15. Bridgewater 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#15 24.1% (+75.9)#755
16. Meriden 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#16 24.1% (+75.9)#763
17. Mitchell 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#17 24.1% (+75.9)#795
18. Zwingle 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#18 24.1% (+75.9)#838
19. Rome 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#19 24.1% (+75.9)#848
20. Sharpsburg 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#20 24.1% (+75.9)#849
21. Grant 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#21 24.1% (+75.9)#867
22. Colwell 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#22 24.1% (+75.9)#873
23. Galt 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#23 24.1% (+75.9)#910
24. Curlew 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#24 24.1% (+75.9)#928
25. Valeria 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#25 24.1% (+75.9)#932
26. Aspinwall 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#26 24.1% (+75.9)#953
27. Coppock 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#27 24.1% (+75.9)#960
28. Thor 92.9% 25.4% (+67.4)#28 24.1% (+68.8)#1,002
29. Farnhamville 90.0% 25.4% (+64.6)#29 24.1% (+65.9)#1,036
30. Pulaski 88.9% 25.4% (+63.4)#30 24.1% (+64.8)#1,061
31. Charter Oak 87.5% 25.4% (+62.1)#31 24.1% (+63.4)#1,090
32. Keystone 86.7% 25.4% (+61.2)#32 24.1% (+62.6)#1,113
33. Bayard 86.7% 25.4% (+61.2)#33 24.1% (+62.6)#1,115
34. Kellogg 85.7% 25.4% (+60.3)#34 24.1% (+61.6)#1,138
35. Volga 85.7% 25.4% (+60.3)#35 24.1% (+61.6)#1,148
36. Bradgate 85.7% 25.4% (+60.3)#36 24.1% (+61.6)#1,154
37. Rowan 84.6% 25.4% (+59.2)#37 24.1% (+60.5)#1,180
38. Baldwin 81.8% 25.4% (+56.4)#38 24.1% (+57.7)#1,275
39. Ferguson 81.8% 25.4% (+56.4)#39 24.1% (+57.7)#1,276
40. Persia 80.0% 25.4% (+54.6)#40 24.1% (+55.9)#1,331
41. Promise City 80.0% 25.4% (+54.6)#41 24.1% (+55.9)#1,354
42. Rembrandt 77.8% 25.4% (+52.3)#42 24.1% (+53.7)#1,436
43. Panora 76.8% 25.4% (+51.3)#43 24.1% (+52.7)#1,479
44. Farmersburg 75.9% 25.4% (+50.4)#44 24.1% (+51.8)#1,513
45. Story City 75.0% 25.4% (+49.6)#45 24.1% (+50.9)#1,536
46. Centralia 75.0% 25.4% (+49.6)#46 24.1% (+50.9)#1,589
47. Chariton 73.8% 25.4% (+48.3)#47 24.1% (+49.7)#1,631
48. Chelsea 73.1% 25.4% (+47.6)#48 24.1% (+49.0)#1,668
49. Doon 72.7% 25.4% (+47.3)#49 24.1% (+48.7)#1,681
50. Inwood 71.4% 25.4% (+46.0)#50 24.1% (+47.4)#1,747
51. Klemme 71.4% 25.4% (+46.0)#51 24.1% (+47.4)#1,750
52. Lorimor 70.6% 25.4% (+45.1)#52 24.1% (+46.5)#1,823
53. Garber 70.0% 25.4% (+44.6)#53 24.1% (+45.9)#1,866
54. Calumet 70.0% 25.4% (+44.6)#54 24.1% (+45.9)#1,867
55. Ackworth 70.0% 25.4% (+44.6)#55 24.1% (+45.9)#1,871
56. Decatur City 69.6% 25.4% (+44.1)#56 24.1% (+45.5)#1,898
57. Aurora 69.2% 25.4% (+43.8)#57 24.1% (+45.2)#1,926
58. Toledo 68.3% 25.4% (+42.9)#58 24.1% (+44.2)#2,003
59. Kiron 68.0% 25.4% (+42.6)#59 24.1% (+43.9)#2,023
60. Blakesburg 67.9% 25.4% (+42.4)#60 24.1% (+43.8)#2,031
61. Arlington 66.7% 25.4% (+41.2)#61 24.1% (+42.6)#2,112
62. Donahue 66.7% 25.4% (+41.2)#62 24.1% (+42.6)#2,125
63. Garrison 66.7% 25.4% (+41.2)#63 24.1% (+42.6)#2,129
64. Cleghorn 66.7% 25.4% (+41.2)#64 24.1% (+42.6)#2,139
65. Cushing 66.7% 25.4% (+41.2)#66 24.1% (+42.6)#2,160
66. Paton 66.7% 25.4% (+41.2)#67 24.1% (+42.6)#2,161
67. Jamaica 66.7% 25.4% (+41.2)#68 24.1% (+42.6)#2,170
68. Floris 66.7% 25.4% (+41.2)#69 24.1% (+42.6)#2,184
69. Greenville 66.7% 25.4% (+41.2)#70 24.1% (+42.6)#2,216
70. Swan 66.7% 25.4% (+41.2)#71 24.1% (+42.6)#2,221
71. Brighton 65.5% 25.4% (+40.1)#72 24.1% (+41.4)#2,275
72. Postville 65.4% 25.4% (+40.0)#73 24.1% (+41.3)#2,282
73. Humeston 64.7% 25.4% (+39.3)#74 24.1% (+40.6)#2,338
74. Milton 64.3% 25.4% (+38.8)#75 24.1% (+40.2)#2,376
75. Meservey 64.3% 25.4% (+38.8)#76 24.1% (+40.2)#2,381
76. Churdan 64.0% 25.4% (+38.6)#77 24.1% (+39.9)#2,401
77. Elma 63.8% 25.4% (+38.4)#78 24.1% (+39.8)#2,412
78. Parkersburg 63.2% 25.4% (+37.7)#79 24.1% (+39.1)#2,472
79. Maysville 63.2% 25.4% (+37.7)#80 24.1% (+39.1)#2,483
80. Waukon 62.7% 25.4% (+37.3)#81 24.1% (+38.7)#2,518
81. New Hartford 62.5% 25.4% (+37.1)#82 24.1% (+38.4)#2,539
82. Joice 62.5% 25.4% (+37.1)#83 24.1% (+38.4)#2,565
83. Oxford Junction 61.5% 25.4% (+36.1)#84 24.1% (+37.5)#2,654
84. Cherokee 60.5% 25.4% (+35.0)#85 24.1% (+36.4)#2,754
85. Onslow 60.0% 25.4% (+34.6)#86 24.1% (+35.9)#2,830
86. Garden Grove 60.0% 25.4% (+34.6)#87 24.1% (+35.9)#2,850
87. Westgate 60.0% 25.4% (+34.6)#88 24.1% (+35.9)#2,851
88. Oakland Acres 60.0% 25.4% (+34.6)#89 24.1% (+35.9)#2,853
89. Monmouth 60.0% 25.4% (+34.6)#90 24.1% (+35.9)#2,869
90. Brayton 60.0% 25.4% (+34.6)#91 24.1% (+35.9)#2,879
91. Stanhope 59.3% 25.4% (+33.8)#92 24.1% (+35.2)#2,941
92. Denison 59.0% 25.4% (+33.6)#93 24.1% (+35.0)#2,972
93. Zearing 58.6% 25.4% (+33.2)#94 24.1% (+34.5)#3,027
94. Ladora 58.3% 25.4% (+32.9)#95 24.1% (+34.3)#3,058
95. Harcourt 58.3% 25.4% (+32.9)#96 24.1% (+34.3)#3,063
96. Maxwell 57.1% 25.4% (+31.7)#97 24.1% (+33.1)#3,159
97. Orient 57.1% 25.4% (+31.7)#98 24.1% (+33.1)#3,176
98. Barnum 57.1% 25.4% (+31.7)#99 24.1% (+33.1)#3,191
99. Defiance 57.1% 25.4% (+31.7)#100 24.1% (+33.1)#3,207
100. Woden 57.1% 25.4% (+31.7)#101 24.1% (+33.1)#3,209

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Iowa are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Iowa?
Ocheyedan has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Iowa with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of Iowa?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Iowa is 25.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.