Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Carolina

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. White Plains 100.0% 26.6% (+73.4)#1 24.1% (+75.9)#150
2. Ingold 100.0% 26.6% (+73.4)#2 24.1% (+75.9)#155
3. South Mills 100.0% 26.6% (+73.4)#3 24.1% (+75.9)#192
4. Cape Colony 100.0% 26.6% (+73.4)#4 24.1% (+75.9)#261
5. Ivanhoe 100.0% 26.6% (+73.4)#5 24.1% (+75.9)#301
6. Waco 100.0% 26.6% (+73.4)#6 24.1% (+75.9)#446
7. Vann Crossroads 100.0% 26.6% (+73.4)#7 24.1% (+75.9)#459
8. Askewville 100.0% 26.6% (+73.4)#8 24.1% (+75.9)#602
9. Long Creek 100.0% 26.6% (+73.4)#9 24.1% (+75.9)#837
10. Mooresboro 94.4% 26.6% (+67.8)#10 24.1% (+70.4)#986
11. Edneyville 93.2% 26.6% (+66.6)#11 24.1% (+69.1)#995
12. South Weldon 93.2% 26.6% (+66.6)#12 24.1% (+69.1)#996
13. Columbia 92.3% 26.6% (+65.7)#13 24.1% (+68.2)#1,005
14. Brunswick 91.5% 26.6% (+64.9)#14 24.1% (+67.4)#1,017
15. Dana 91.0% 26.6% (+64.4)#15 24.1% (+66.9)#1,021
16. Harrells 88.9% 26.6% (+62.3)#16 24.1% (+64.8)#1,071
17. Gorman 86.4% 26.6% (+59.8)#17 24.1% (+62.3)#1,124
18. Patterson Springs 86.0% 26.6% (+59.4)#18 24.1% (+62.0)#1,132
19. Conetoe 85.7% 26.6% (+59.1)#19 24.1% (+61.6)#1,137
20. Maury 85.5% 26.6% (+58.8)#20 24.1% (+61.4)#1,159
21. Silver City 84.8% 26.6% (+58.2)#21 24.1% (+60.8)#1,173
22. Bonnetsville 82.6% 26.6% (+56.0)#22 24.1% (+58.5)#1,243
23. Dudley 82.2% 26.6% (+55.6)#23 24.1% (+58.1)#1,256
24. Robbins 81.9% 26.6% (+55.3)#24 24.1% (+57.9)#1,262
25. Roxobel 81.5% 26.6% (+54.9)#25 24.1% (+57.4)#1,284
26. Pink Hill 80.6% 26.6% (+53.9)#26 24.1% (+56.5)#1,310
27. Creswell 80.0% 26.6% (+53.4)#27 24.1% (+55.9)#1,347
28. Old Hundred 78.4% 26.6% (+51.8)#28 24.1% (+54.4)#1,396
29. Sandyfield 77.8% 26.6% (+51.2)#29 24.1% (+53.7)#1,420
30. Fountain 77.8% 26.6% (+51.2)#30 24.1% (+53.7)#1,430
31. Light Oak 77.6% 26.6% (+51.0)#31 24.1% (+53.6)#1,445
32. Ramseur 76.9% 26.6% (+50.3)#32 24.1% (+52.8)#1,468
33. Biltmore Forest 76.5% 26.6% (+49.9)#33 24.1% (+52.4)#1,489
34. Robbinsville 75.0% 26.6% (+48.4)#34 24.1% (+50.9)#1,542
35. Silver Lake 74.9% 26.6% (+48.2)#35 24.1% (+50.8)#1,599
36. Chadbourn 74.0% 26.6% (+47.4)#36 24.1% (+49.9)#1,623
37. Saxapahaw 73.8% 26.6% (+47.2)#37 24.1% (+49.8)#1,628
38. Fairplains 73.2% 26.6% (+46.6)#38 24.1% (+49.1)#1,663
39. Cove Creek 72.7% 26.6% (+46.1)#39 24.1% (+48.7)#1,678
40. Momeyer 72.7% 26.6% (+46.1)#40 24.1% (+48.7)#1,686
41. Hamlet 72.1% 26.6% (+45.5)#41 24.1% (+48.1)#1,719
42. Biscoe 70.8% 26.6% (+44.2)#42 24.1% (+46.8)#1,800
43. Cordova 69.2% 26.6% (+42.6)#43 24.1% (+45.2)#1,912
44. Colerain 69.2% 26.6% (+42.6)#44 24.1% (+45.2)#1,921
45. Cricket 69.2% 26.6% (+42.5)#45 24.1% (+45.1)#1,928
46. Skippers Corner 68.9% 26.6% (+42.3)#46 24.1% (+44.9)#1,942
47. Bolton 68.8% 26.6% (+42.1)#47 24.1% (+44.7)#1,962
48. Seagrove 66.7% 26.6% (+40.1)#48 24.1% (+42.6)#2,118
49. Elizabethtown 66.5% 26.6% (+39.9)#49 24.1% (+42.4)#2,228
50. Beulaville 65.9% 26.6% (+39.2)#50 24.1% (+41.8)#2,257
51. Magnolia 65.8% 26.6% (+39.2)#51 24.1% (+41.7)#2,262
52. Fremont 65.0% 26.6% (+38.4)#52 24.1% (+40.9)#2,314
53. Andrews 64.7% 26.6% (+38.1)#53 24.1% (+40.6)#2,336
54. East Spencer 64.4% 26.6% (+37.7)#54 24.1% (+40.3)#2,365
55. River Road 64.3% 26.6% (+37.7)#55 24.1% (+40.2)#2,367
56. Mount Airy 63.8% 26.6% (+37.2)#56 24.1% (+39.7)#2,413
57. Faison 63.4% 26.6% (+36.8)#57 24.1% (+39.3)#2,453
58. East Rockingham 62.7% 26.6% (+36.0)#58 24.1% (+38.6)#2,524
59. Snow Hill 62.5% 26.6% (+35.9)#59 24.1% (+38.4)#2,528
60. Rich Square 62.5% 26.6% (+35.9)#60 24.1% (+38.4)#2,540
61. Polkville 62.5% 26.6% (+35.9)#61 24.1% (+38.4)#2,547
62. Bolivia 62.5% 26.6% (+35.9)#62 24.1% (+38.4)#2,571
63. Brogden 61.9% 26.6% (+35.3)#63 24.1% (+37.9)#2,612
64. Vanceboro 61.6% 26.6% (+35.0)#64 24.1% (+37.6)#2,643
65. St Pauls 61.3% 26.6% (+34.7)#65 24.1% (+37.2)#2,679
66. Barker Heights 60.7% 26.6% (+34.1)#66 24.1% (+36.6)#2,735
67. Advance 60.5% 26.6% (+33.9)#67 24.1% (+36.4)#2,748
68. Washington Park 60.0% 26.6% (+33.4)#68 24.1% (+35.9)#2,816
69. Trenton 60.0% 26.6% (+33.4)#69 24.1% (+35.9)#2,862
70. Belhaven 59.7% 26.6% (+33.1)#70 24.1% (+35.7)#2,892
71. Grimesland 59.1% 26.6% (+32.5)#71 24.1% (+35.0)#2,966
72. Maxton 58.9% 26.6% (+32.3)#72 24.1% (+34.8)#2,984
73. Staley 58.8% 26.6% (+32.2)#73 24.1% (+34.7)#2,999
74. Laurinburg 58.6% 26.6% (+32.0)#74 24.1% (+34.5)#3,028
75. Rockingham 58.5% 26.6% (+31.9)#75 24.1% (+34.4)#3,031
76. Mocksville 57.9% 26.6% (+31.3)#76 24.1% (+33.8)#3,089
77. Tabor City 57.8% 26.6% (+31.2)#77 24.1% (+33.7)#3,101
78. Stoneville 57.5% 26.6% (+30.9)#78 24.1% (+33.5)#3,121
79. Jamesville 57.1% 26.6% (+30.5)#79 24.1% (+33.1)#3,182
80. Salemburg 57.1% 26.6% (+30.5)#80 24.1% (+33.1)#3,189
81. Everetts 57.1% 26.6% (+30.5)#81 24.1% (+33.1)#3,194
82. Middleburg 57.1% 26.6% (+30.5)#82 24.1% (+33.1)#3,204
83. Benson 56.8% 26.6% (+30.2)#83 24.1% (+32.7)#3,249
84. Reidsville 56.7% 26.6% (+30.0)#84 24.1% (+32.6)#3,265
85. Love Valley 56.5% 26.6% (+29.9)#85 24.1% (+32.4)#3,286
86. Chocowinity 56.4% 26.6% (+29.8)#86 24.1% (+32.3)#3,299
87. Woodland 56.0% 26.6% (+29.4)#87 24.1% (+31.9)#3,352
88. Farmville 55.9% 26.6% (+29.3)#88 24.1% (+31.8)#3,358
89. Mountain View 55.9% 26.6% (+29.2)#89 24.1% (+31.8)#3,364
90. Murphy 55.7% 26.6% (+29.1)#90 24.1% (+31.6)#3,382
91. Shallotte 55.6% 26.6% (+29.0)#91 24.1% (+31.5)#3,385
92. Dortches 55.6% 26.6% (+28.9)#92 24.1% (+31.5)#3,394
93. Selma 55.4% 26.6% (+28.8)#93 24.1% (+31.3)#3,433
94. Sylva 55.3% 26.6% (+28.7)#94 24.1% (+31.2)#3,447
95. Taylorsville 55.2% 26.6% (+28.6)#95 24.1% (+31.2)#3,450
96. Conway 55.2% 26.6% (+28.6)#96 24.1% (+31.1)#3,452
97. Forest Hills 54.5% 26.6% (+27.9)#97 24.1% (+30.5)#3,544
98. Lansing 54.5% 26.6% (+27.9)#98 24.1% (+30.5)#3,553
99. Candor 54.2% 26.6% (+27.6)#99 24.1% (+30.1)#3,590
100. Burnsville 54.1% 26.6% (+27.5)#100 24.1% (+30.0)#3,601

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
94.4%
#9
93.2%
#10
93.2%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Carolina?
White Plains has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Carolina is 26.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.