Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in New Mexico

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
New Mexico
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in New Mexico

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in New Mexico Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in New Mexico

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Kirtland Afb 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#1 24.1% (+75.9)#7
2. Angustura 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#2 24.1% (+75.9)#30
3. Fort Sumner 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#3 24.1% (+75.9)#68
4. El Duende 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#4 24.1% (+75.9)#76
5. El Rito 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#5 24.1% (+75.9)#106
6. Cedar Crest 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#6 24.1% (+75.9)#118
7. Ventura 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#7 24.1% (+75.9)#141
8. Tyrone 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#8 24.1% (+75.9)#163
9. Tortugas 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#9 24.1% (+75.9)#167
10. La Hacienda 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#10 24.1% (+75.9)#183
11. Monterey Park 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#11 24.1% (+75.9)#214
12. Cuba 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#12 24.1% (+75.9)#227
13. Placitas Cdp Dona Ana County 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#13 24.1% (+75.9)#250
14. Paguate 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#14 24.1% (+75.9)#267
15. Totah Vista 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#15 24.1% (+75.9)#288
16. Hyde Park 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#16 24.1% (+75.9)#312
17. Cotton City 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#17 24.1% (+75.9)#327
18. Seama 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#18 24.1% (+75.9)#339
19. Homer C Jones 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#19 24.1% (+75.9)#373
20. Ribera 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#20 24.1% (+75.9)#391
21. Roy 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#21 24.1% (+75.9)#444
22. Soham 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#22 24.1% (+75.9)#504
23. Twin Forks 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#23 24.1% (+75.9)#512
24. Jamestown 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#24 24.1% (+75.9)#525
25. Pueblo Pintado 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#25 24.1% (+75.9)#542
26. Chical 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#26 24.1% (+75.9)#552
27. Pie Town 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#27 24.1% (+75.9)#621
28. Medanales 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#28 24.1% (+75.9)#636
29. Corona 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#29 24.1% (+75.9)#803
30. Regina 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#30 24.1% (+75.9)#852
31. Manuelito 100.0% 29.3% (+70.7)#31 24.1% (+75.9)#935
32. Santa Teresa 91.3% 29.3% (+62.0)#32 24.1% (+67.2)#1,018
33. Dixon 88.7% 29.3% (+59.4)#33 24.1% (+64.6)#1,076
34. Logan 87.0% 29.3% (+57.7)#34 24.1% (+62.9)#1,108
35. Nageezi 83.3% 29.3% (+54.0)#35 24.1% (+59.3)#1,216
36. Prewitt 81.9% 29.3% (+52.7)#36 24.1% (+57.9)#1,264
37. Tecolotito 77.1% 29.3% (+47.9)#37 24.1% (+53.1)#1,462
38. Keeler Farm 77.1% 29.3% (+47.8)#38 24.1% (+53.0)#1,463
39. Melrose 74.1% 29.3% (+44.8)#39 24.1% (+50.0)#1,617
40. Carrizozo 72.4% 29.3% (+43.1)#40 24.1% (+48.3)#1,705
41. Brimhall Nizhoni 71.4% 29.3% (+42.1)#41 24.1% (+47.4)#1,752
42. Glen Acres 71.4% 29.3% (+42.1)#42 24.1% (+47.4)#1,760
43. Pinedale 71.2% 29.3% (+41.9)#43 24.1% (+47.1)#1,784
44. Tatum 70.9% 29.3% (+41.6)#44 24.1% (+46.9)#1,799
45. Napi Headquarters 70.7% 29.3% (+41.4)#45 24.1% (+46.7)#1,811
46. Tohatchi 70.7% 29.3% (+41.4)#46 24.1% (+46.6)#1,812
47. Questa 70.2% 29.3% (+40.9)#47 24.1% (+46.1)#1,840
48. Becenti 68.4% 29.3% (+39.1)#48 24.1% (+44.3)#1,998
49. Hatch 67.6% 29.3% (+38.3)#49 24.1% (+43.5)#2,043
50. Highland Meadows 66.7% 29.3% (+37.4)#50 24.1% (+42.6)#2,117
51. Holloman Afb 66.2% 29.3% (+36.9)#51 24.1% (+42.1)#2,242
52. Grants 65.2% 29.3% (+36.0)#52 24.1% (+41.2)#2,294
53. Ojo Encino 64.0% 29.3% (+34.7)#53 24.1% (+39.9)#2,402
54. Elida 63.6% 29.3% (+34.3)#54 24.1% (+39.6)#2,438
55. Borrego Pass 63.6% 29.3% (+34.3)#55 24.1% (+39.6)#2,443
56. Navajo 62.5% 29.3% (+33.3)#56 24.1% (+38.5)#2,526
57. Williamsburg 62.5% 29.3% (+33.2)#57 24.1% (+38.4)#2,538
58. Black Rock 62.0% 29.3% (+32.7)#58 24.1% (+37.9)#2,607
59. Crouch Mesa 61.2% 29.3% (+31.9)#59 24.1% (+37.2)#2,689
60. Paraje 61.0% 29.3% (+31.7)#60 24.1% (+36.9)#2,710
61. Alamo 59.6% 29.3% (+30.3)#61 24.1% (+35.5)#2,905
62. Springer 58.9% 29.3% (+29.6)#62 24.1% (+34.8)#2,985
63. Sheep Springs 57.6% 29.3% (+28.3)#63 24.1% (+33.5)#3,118
64. Rio Communities 57.1% 29.3% (+27.9)#64 24.1% (+33.1)#3,148
65. Torreon Cdp Sandoval County 57.1% 29.3% (+27.9)#65 24.1% (+33.1)#3,170
66. Nara Visa 57.1% 29.3% (+27.9)#66 24.1% (+33.1)#3,213
67. Mescalero 56.7% 29.3% (+27.4)#67 24.1% (+32.6)#3,260
68. Ruidoso Downs 55.3% 29.3% (+26.0)#68 24.1% (+31.3)#3,442
69. South Acomita Village 55.0% 29.3% (+25.7)#69 24.1% (+30.9)#3,493
70. Loving 54.8% 29.3% (+25.5)#70 24.1% (+30.8)#3,503
71. Gamerco 54.5% 29.3% (+25.3)#71 24.1% (+30.5)#3,524
72. Truth Or Consequences 54.5% 29.3% (+25.2)#72 24.1% (+30.4)#3,558
73. Barton 53.8% 29.3% (+24.6)#73 24.1% (+29.8)#3,635
74. North Acomita Village 52.9% 29.3% (+23.6)#74 24.1% (+28.9)#3,787
75. Jal 52.7% 29.3% (+23.4)#75 24.1% (+28.6)#3,813
76. Laguna 52.6% 29.3% (+23.3)#76 24.1% (+28.6)#3,826
77. San Jose Cdp Rio Arriba County 51.4% 29.3% (+22.1)#77 24.1% (+27.4)#3,993
78. San Felipe Pueblo 50.6% 29.3% (+21.4)#78 24.1% (+26.6)#4,078
79. University Park 50.0% 29.3% (+20.7)#79 24.1% (+25.9)#4,126
80. Elephant Butte 50.0% 29.3% (+20.7)#80 24.1% (+25.9)#4,138
81. Indian Hills 50.0% 29.3% (+20.7)#81 24.1% (+25.9)#4,155
82. Newcomb 50.0% 29.3% (+20.7)#82 24.1% (+25.9)#4,243
83. Pinehill 50.0% 29.3% (+20.7)#83 24.1% (+25.9)#4,259
84. Peralta 49.7% 29.3% (+20.4)#84 24.1% (+25.7)#4,482
85. West Hammond 49.5% 29.3% (+20.2)#85 24.1% (+25.4)#4,502
86. Vaughn 48.8% 29.3% (+19.5)#86 24.1% (+24.7)#4,579
87. Moriarty 47.9% 29.3% (+18.6)#87 24.1% (+23.8)#4,735
88. White Rock 47.6% 29.3% (+18.3)#88 24.1% (+23.5)#4,782
89. North Valley 47.6% 29.3% (+18.3)#89 24.1% (+23.5)#4,802
90. Penasco 47.4% 29.3% (+18.1)#90 24.1% (+23.3)#4,829
91. Anthony 47.1% 29.3% (+17.8)#91 24.1% (+23.0)#4,876
92. Clovis 46.8% 29.3% (+17.5)#92 24.1% (+22.7)#4,942
93. Pueblo Of Sandia Village 45.0% 29.3% (+15.7)#93 24.1% (+20.9)#5,254
94. Seboyeta 44.4% 29.3% (+15.2)#94 24.1% (+20.4)#5,366
95. Paradise Hills 44.1% 29.3% (+14.8)#95 24.1% (+20.0)#5,452
96. Shiprock 44.0% 29.3% (+14.7)#96 24.1% (+20.0)#5,455
97. South River 43.9% 29.3% (+14.6)#97 24.1% (+19.9)#5,479
98. Edgewood 43.8% 29.3% (+14.5)#98 24.1% (+19.8)#5,496
99. Bloomfield 43.8% 29.3% (+14.5)#99 24.1% (+19.7)#5,505
100. Willard 43.8% 29.3% (+14.5)#100 24.1% (+19.7)#5,532

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in New Mexico?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in New Mexico are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in New Mexico?
Fort Sumner has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in New Mexico with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of New Mexico?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in New Mexico is 29.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.