Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Boys 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota

City Child Poverty (Boys) vs State vs National
1. Porcupine 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#66
2. Manderson White Horse Creek 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#122
3. Parmelee 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#183
4. Wounded Knee 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#209
5. Long Hollow 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#5 16.9% (+83.1)#216
6. Little Eagle 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#6 16.9% (+83.1)#227
7. Soldier Creek 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#7 16.9% (+83.1)#262
8. Cherry Creek 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#8 16.9% (+83.1)#309
9. Horse Creek 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#9 16.9% (+83.1)#336
10. Corn Creek 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#10 16.9% (+83.1)#371
11. Swift Bird 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#11 16.9% (+83.1)#374
12. Spring Creek 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#12 16.9% (+83.1)#400
13. Norris 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#13 16.9% (+83.1)#403
14. Central City 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#14 16.9% (+83.1)#454
15. New Witten 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#15 16.9% (+83.1)#552
16. Wood 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#16 16.9% (+83.1)#588
17. Ortley 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#17 16.9% (+83.1)#593
18. Ideal 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#18 16.9% (+83.1)#600
19. Onaka 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#19 16.9% (+83.1)#650
20. Wakpala 98.1% 15.6% (+82.5)#20 16.9% (+81.2)#661
21. Antelope 88.3% 15.6% (+72.7)#21 16.9% (+71.4)#764
22. Enemy Swim 87.5% 15.6% (+71.9)#22 16.9% (+70.6)#777
23. Bridger 87.0% 15.6% (+71.4)#23 16.9% (+70.1)#787
24. La Plant 82.7% 15.6% (+67.1)#24 16.9% (+65.8)#921
25. Bristol 80.0% 15.6% (+64.4)#25 16.9% (+63.1)#999
26. Murdo 79.7% 15.6% (+64.1)#26 16.9% (+62.8)#1,023
27. Kyle 79.3% 15.6% (+63.7)#27 16.9% (+62.4)#1,037
28. Nisland 77.8% 15.6% (+62.2)#28 16.9% (+60.9)#1,091
29. Marty 76.9% 15.6% (+61.3)#29 16.9% (+60.0)#1,123
30. Bullhead 76.5% 15.6% (+60.9)#30 16.9% (+59.6)#1,133
31. Brandt 71.4% 15.6% (+55.9)#31 16.9% (+54.5)#1,352
32. Avon 70.9% 15.6% (+55.4)#32 16.9% (+54.0)#1,377
33. Fort Thompson 69.9% 15.6% (+54.4)#33 16.9% (+53.0)#1,429
34. Two Strike 68.9% 15.6% (+53.3)#34 16.9% (+52.0)#1,471
35. Bryant 67.8% 15.6% (+52.2)#35 16.9% (+50.9)#1,525
36. Rosebud 66.7% 15.6% (+51.2)#36 16.9% (+49.8)#1,563
37. Claremont 66.7% 15.6% (+51.1)#37 16.9% (+49.8)#1,608
38. Peever 64.3% 15.6% (+48.7)#38 16.9% (+47.4)#1,736
39. Springfield 62.3% 15.6% (+46.7)#39 16.9% (+45.4)#1,855
40. Lower Brule 60.4% 15.6% (+44.8)#40 16.9% (+43.5)#1,974
41. Okreek 60.0% 15.6% (+44.4)#41 16.9% (+43.1)#2,008
42. Bonesteel 59.6% 15.6% (+44.0)#42 16.9% (+42.7)#2,038
43. Hot Springs 59.4% 15.6% (+43.9)#43 16.9% (+42.5)#2,048
44. Pine Ridge 59.0% 15.6% (+43.5)#44 16.9% (+42.1)#2,070
45. Clark Colony 58.3% 15.6% (+42.8)#45 16.9% (+41.4)#2,139
46. Peever Flats 57.8% 15.6% (+42.2)#46 16.9% (+40.9)#2,175
47. Dupree 55.8% 15.6% (+40.2)#47 16.9% (+38.9)#2,334
48. Howard 55.4% 15.6% (+39.9)#48 16.9% (+38.5)#2,369
49. Mission 53.2% 15.6% (+37.6)#49 16.9% (+36.3)#2,571
50. Faith 52.9% 15.6% (+37.4)#50 16.9% (+36.0)#2,587
51. Naples 52.9% 15.6% (+37.4)#51 16.9% (+36.0)#2,595
52. West Brule 52.9% 15.6% (+37.3)#52 16.9% (+36.0)#2,600
53. Oglala 52.3% 15.6% (+36.8)#53 16.9% (+35.4)#2,658
54. Big Stone City 51.9% 15.6% (+36.3)#54 16.9% (+35.0)#2,696
55. White Horse 51.7% 15.6% (+36.1)#55 16.9% (+34.8)#2,714
56. Tulare 51.6% 15.6% (+36.0)#56 16.9% (+34.7)#2,726
57. Eagle Butte 50.6% 15.6% (+35.0)#57 16.9% (+33.7)#2,821
58. Wanblee 50.3% 15.6% (+34.8)#58 16.9% (+33.4)#2,837
59. Morristown 50.0% 15.6% (+34.4)#59 16.9% (+33.1)#2,976
60. Colome 47.9% 15.6% (+32.3)#60 16.9% (+31.0)#3,196
61. Johnson Siding 47.7% 15.6% (+32.1)#61 16.9% (+30.8)#3,208
62. St Francis 46.9% 15.6% (+31.3)#62 16.9% (+30.0)#3,319
63. Hermosa 46.9% 15.6% (+31.3)#63 16.9% (+30.0)#3,325
64. Winner 45.0% 15.6% (+29.5)#64 16.9% (+28.1)#3,556
65. Lake Andes 44.0% 15.6% (+28.4)#65 16.9% (+27.1)#3,681
66. Allen 43.8% 15.6% (+28.3)#66 16.9% (+26.9)#3,711
67. Viborg 43.6% 15.6% (+28.0)#67 16.9% (+26.7)#3,750
68. Sisseton 43.2% 15.6% (+27.6)#68 16.9% (+26.3)#3,825
69. North Eagle Butte 43.1% 15.6% (+27.5)#69 16.9% (+26.2)#3,838
70. Green Valley 42.2% 15.6% (+26.6)#70 16.9% (+25.3)#3,978
71. Burke 42.0% 15.6% (+26.4)#71 16.9% (+25.1)#3,998
72. Sicangu 40.3% 15.6% (+24.7)#72 16.9% (+23.4)#4,249
73. Hudson 39.6% 15.6% (+24.0)#73 16.9% (+22.7)#4,396
74. Edgemont 39.5% 15.6% (+23.9)#74 16.9% (+22.6)#4,422
75. Gettysburg 39.1% 15.6% (+23.5)#75 16.9% (+22.2)#4,483
76. Armour 38.8% 15.6% (+23.2)#76 16.9% (+21.8)#4,546
77. Veblen 37.3% 15.6% (+21.7)#77 16.9% (+20.4)#4,813
78. Doland 37.0% 15.6% (+21.5)#78 16.9% (+20.1)#4,854
79. White River 36.5% 15.6% (+20.9)#79 16.9% (+19.6)#4,950
80. Platte 35.7% 15.6% (+20.1)#80 16.9% (+18.8)#5,112
81. Philip 34.4% 15.6% (+18.8)#81 16.9% (+17.5)#5,427
82. Custer 33.3% 15.6% (+17.8)#82 16.9% (+16.4)#5,616
83. Chancellor 33.3% 15.6% (+17.8)#83 16.9% (+16.4)#5,685
84. Vienna 33.3% 15.6% (+17.8)#84 16.9% (+16.4)#5,733
85. Ravinia 33.3% 15.6% (+17.8)#85 16.9% (+16.4)#5,752
86. Lemmon 32.8% 15.6% (+17.2)#86 16.9% (+15.9)#5,846
87. South Shore 31.6% 15.6% (+16.0)#87 16.9% (+14.7)#6,157
88. Martin 30.9% 15.6% (+15.3)#88 16.9% (+13.9)#6,330
89. Mobridge 30.2% 15.6% (+14.6)#89 16.9% (+13.2)#6,526
90. Madison 30.1% 15.6% (+14.5)#90 16.9% (+13.2)#6,540
91. Rosholt 29.4% 15.6% (+13.8)#91 16.9% (+12.5)#6,714
92. Hoven 28.9% 15.6% (+13.3)#92 16.9% (+12.0)#6,854
93. Lake Preston 27.5% 15.6% (+11.9)#93 16.9% (+10.6)#7,272
94. Lake Madison 27.3% 15.6% (+11.7)#94 16.9% (+10.4)#7,327
95. Summit 27.3% 15.6% (+11.7)#95 16.9% (+10.4)#7,339
96. Strandburg 26.7% 15.6% (+11.1)#96 16.9% (+9.76)#7,538
97. Pickstown 26.3% 15.6% (+10.7)#97 16.9% (+9.41)#7,650
98. Lead 25.0% 15.6% (+9.42)#98 16.9% (+8.10)#8,027
99. Ethan 25.0% 15.6% (+9.42)#99 16.9% (+8.10)#8,089
100. New Effington 25.0% 15.6% (+9.42)#100 16.9% (+8.10)#8,103

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota?
Porcupine has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the State of South Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota is 15.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.