Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Boys 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Indiana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Indiana

City Child Poverty (Boys) vs State vs National
1. Thayer 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#120
2. Lewis 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#133
3. Servia 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#201
4. Abington 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#284
5. Brimfield 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#5 16.9% (+83.1)#304
6. Liberty Mills 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#6 16.9% (+83.1)#311
7. Marion 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#7 16.9% (+83.1)#337
8. Burnett 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#8 16.9% (+83.1)#346
9. Arthur 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#9 16.9% (+83.1)#349
10. Millville 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#10 16.9% (+83.1)#357
11. Adams 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#11 16.9% (+83.1)#363
12. Alford 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#12 16.9% (+83.1)#368
13. Deer Creek 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#13 16.9% (+83.1)#387
14. Pence 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#14 16.9% (+83.1)#391
15. Eugene 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#15 16.9% (+83.1)#398
16. Grayford 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#16 16.9% (+83.1)#455
17. Linn Grove 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#17 16.9% (+83.1)#464
18. Otisco 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#18 16.9% (+83.1)#476
19. St. Omer 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#19 16.9% (+83.1)#510
20. Hobbs 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#20 16.9% (+83.1)#514
21. Cross Plains 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#21 16.9% (+83.1)#520
22. Florence 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#22 16.9% (+83.1)#537
23. Penntown 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#23 16.9% (+83.1)#545
24. Pulaski 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#24 16.9% (+83.1)#618
25. Hartz Lake 92.0% 16.3% (+75.6)#25 16.9% (+75.1)#701
26. Leiters Ford 86.0% 16.3% (+69.7)#26 16.9% (+69.1)#817
27. Boston 85.7% 16.3% (+69.4)#27 16.9% (+68.8)#822
28. Switz City 81.2% 16.3% (+64.9)#28 16.9% (+64.3)#967
29. Otwell 80.4% 16.3% (+64.0)#29 16.9% (+63.5)#991
30. La Paz 80.0% 16.3% (+63.7)#30 16.9% (+63.1)#996
31. Patriot 77.3% 16.3% (+60.9)#31 16.9% (+60.4)#1,110
32. Hardinsburg 76.5% 16.3% (+60.1)#32 16.9% (+59.6)#1,136
33. Laconia 75.0% 16.3% (+58.7)#33 16.9% (+58.1)#1,200
34. Alamo 75.0% 16.3% (+58.7)#34 16.9% (+58.1)#1,202
35. English 73.8% 16.3% (+57.5)#35 16.9% (+56.9)#1,241
36. Ambia 70.5% 16.3% (+54.2)#36 16.9% (+53.6)#1,399
37. Roseland 69.2% 16.3% (+52.9)#37 16.9% (+52.3)#1,452
38. Marengo 67.9% 16.3% (+51.5)#38 16.9% (+51.0)#1,519
39. Hanna 66.7% 16.3% (+50.3)#39 16.9% (+49.8)#1,568
40. Coal 66.7% 16.3% (+50.3)#40 16.9% (+49.8)#1,610
41. Kewanna 63.8% 16.3% (+47.4)#41 16.9% (+46.9)#1,755
42. Redkey 62.5% 16.3% (+46.2)#42 16.9% (+45.6)#1,828
43. La Fontaine 62.3% 16.3% (+46.0)#43 16.9% (+45.4)#1,854
44. Amity 57.7% 16.3% (+41.4)#44 16.9% (+40.8)#2,181
45. Jonesville 57.1% 16.3% (+40.8)#45 16.9% (+40.2)#2,227
46. Loogootee 54.5% 16.3% (+38.2)#46 16.9% (+37.6)#2,451
47. Gary 54.3% 16.3% (+37.9)#47 16.9% (+37.4)#2,474
48. Larwill 54.1% 16.3% (+37.7)#48 16.9% (+37.2)#2,492
49. Windfall City 52.4% 16.3% (+36.0)#49 16.9% (+35.5)#2,647
50. Hymera 51.2% 16.3% (+34.9)#50 16.9% (+34.3)#2,767
51. Fairmount 50.0% 16.3% (+33.7)#51 16.9% (+33.1)#2,851
52. Seelyville 50.0% 16.3% (+33.7)#52 16.9% (+33.1)#2,868
53. Boswell 50.0% 16.3% (+33.7)#53 16.9% (+33.1)#2,874
54. Hudson 50.0% 16.3% (+33.7)#54 16.9% (+33.1)#2,884
55. Edwardsport 50.0% 16.3% (+33.7)#55 16.9% (+33.1)#2,915
56. Crane 50.0% 16.3% (+33.7)#56 16.9% (+33.1)#2,917
57. Poneto 50.0% 16.3% (+33.7)#57 16.9% (+33.1)#2,940
58. South Whitley 49.2% 16.3% (+32.8)#58 16.9% (+32.3)#3,036
59. Lyons 49.1% 16.3% (+32.7)#59 16.9% (+32.2)#3,048
60. Bremen 48.0% 16.3% (+31.7)#60 16.9% (+31.1)#3,177
61. Kempton 47.6% 16.3% (+31.3)#61 16.9% (+30.7)#3,223
62. Rosedale 47.2% 16.3% (+30.9)#62 16.9% (+30.3)#3,263
63. New Salisbury 46.9% 16.3% (+30.6)#63 16.9% (+30.0)#3,318
64. Campbellsburg 46.9% 16.3% (+30.5)#64 16.9% (+30.0)#3,323
65. Bainbridge 46.8% 16.3% (+30.4)#65 16.9% (+29.8)#3,333
66. Cromwell 45.9% 16.3% (+29.6)#66 16.9% (+29.0)#3,438
67. Peru 45.2% 16.3% (+28.9)#67 16.9% (+28.3)#3,528
68. Dillsboro 44.2% 16.3% (+27.8)#68 16.9% (+27.3)#3,668
69. Kentland 44.0% 16.3% (+27.6)#69 16.9% (+27.1)#3,693
70. Clinton 43.9% 16.3% (+27.5)#70 16.9% (+27.0)#3,706
71. East Chicago 43.5% 16.3% (+27.2)#71 16.9% (+26.6)#3,760
72. Paragon 43.5% 16.3% (+27.1)#72 16.9% (+26.6)#3,765
73. Waynetown 43.4% 16.3% (+27.1)#73 16.9% (+26.5)#3,786
74. Michiana Shores 42.9% 16.3% (+26.5)#74 16.9% (+26.0)#3,864
75. Gentryville 42.9% 16.3% (+26.5)#75 16.9% (+26.0)#3,871
76. Millersburg 42.8% 16.3% (+26.4)#76 16.9% (+25.8)#3,904
77. Montpelier 42.7% 16.3% (+26.3)#77 16.9% (+25.8)#3,915
78. Johnson 42.6% 16.3% (+26.3)#78 16.9% (+25.7)#3,926
79. Tennyson 42.1% 16.3% (+25.8)#79 16.9% (+25.2)#3,988
80. Dana 41.9% 16.3% (+25.6)#80 16.9% (+25.0)#4,010
81. Leavenworth 41.7% 16.3% (+25.3)#81 16.9% (+24.8)#4,051
82. Winamac 41.3% 16.3% (+25.0)#82 16.9% (+24.4)#4,111
83. Jasonville 40.8% 16.3% (+24.5)#83 16.9% (+23.9)#4,176
84. Monroe City 40.4% 16.3% (+24.1)#84 16.9% (+23.5)#4,234
85. Lawrenceburg 40.4% 16.3% (+24.0)#85 16.9% (+23.5)#4,240
86. Pine Village 40.0% 16.3% (+23.7)#86 16.9% (+23.1)#4,324
87. Shelburn 39.2% 16.3% (+22.9)#87 16.9% (+22.3)#4,452
88. Mount Summit 38.9% 16.3% (+22.6)#88 16.9% (+22.0)#4,511
89. Staunton 38.9% 16.3% (+22.6)#89 16.9% (+22.0)#4,514
90. Blountsville 38.9% 16.3% (+22.6)#90 16.9% (+22.0)#4,519
91. Stinesville 38.5% 16.3% (+22.1)#91 16.9% (+21.6)#4,577
92. Elizabeth 38.5% 16.3% (+22.1)#92 16.9% (+21.6)#4,587
93. Grissom Afb 38.3% 16.3% (+22.0)#93 16.9% (+21.4)#4,623
94. Pittsburg 38.1% 16.3% (+21.8)#94 16.9% (+21.2)#4,661
95. Simonton Lake 37.0% 16.3% (+20.7)#95 16.9% (+20.1)#4,858
96. Amo 36.5% 16.3% (+20.2)#96 16.9% (+19.6)#4,942
97. Saltillo 36.4% 16.3% (+20.0)#97 16.9% (+19.5)#4,986
98. Terre Haute 36.3% 16.3% (+20.0)#98 16.9% (+19.4)#4,995
99. Cannelton 36.3% 16.3% (+20.0)#99 16.9% (+19.4)#4,997
100. Michigan City 35.8% 16.3% (+19.4)#100 16.9% (+18.9)#5,100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Indiana are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
85.7%
#4
81.2%
#5
80.4%
#6
80.0%
#7
77.3%
#8
76.5%
#9
75.0%
#10
75.0%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Indiana?
Marion has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Indiana with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the State of Indiana?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Indiana is 16.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.