Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Boys 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota

City Child Poverty (Boys) vs State vs National
1. Perley 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#461
2. Inger 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#505
3. Ebro 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#516
4. Nielsville 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#521
5. Dundee 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#5 16.9% (+83.1)#531
6. Goodridge 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#6 16.9% (+83.1)#533
7. New Trier 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#7 16.9% (+83.1)#555
8. Kenneth 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#8 16.9% (+83.1)#562
9. Funkley 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#9 16.9% (+83.1)#575
10. Essig 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#10 16.9% (+83.1)#580
11. Nashua 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#11 16.9% (+83.1)#591
12. Bruno 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#12 16.9% (+83.1)#614
13. Wilder 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#13 16.9% (+83.1)#621
14. South End 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#14 16.9% (+83.1)#627
15. Farwell 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#15 16.9% (+83.1)#633
16. Dent 92.9% 10.9% (+82.0)#16 16.9% (+76.0)#692
17. Richville 91.7% 10.9% (+80.8)#17 16.9% (+74.8)#711
18. Lengby 90.0% 10.9% (+79.1)#18 16.9% (+73.1)#733
19. Marietta 86.4% 10.9% (+75.5)#19 16.9% (+69.5)#807
20. Mahnomen 80.0% 10.9% (+69.1)#20 16.9% (+63.1)#1,002
21. Wilton 72.0% 10.9% (+61.1)#21 16.9% (+55.1)#1,320
22. Spring Park 71.7% 10.9% (+60.9)#22 16.9% (+54.8)#1,333
23. Bena 71.4% 10.9% (+60.5)#23 16.9% (+54.5)#1,350
24. Ball Club 71.4% 10.9% (+60.5)#24 16.9% (+54.5)#1,353
25. Squaw Lake 71.4% 10.9% (+60.5)#25 16.9% (+54.5)#1,355
26. Finlayson 68.4% 10.9% (+57.5)#26 16.9% (+51.5)#1,495
27. Kelliher 66.7% 10.9% (+55.8)#27 16.9% (+49.8)#1,573
28. Correll 66.7% 10.9% (+55.8)#28 16.9% (+49.8)#1,616
29. Twin Lakes 63.6% 10.9% (+52.7)#29 16.9% (+46.7)#1,763
30. Warba 63.3% 10.9% (+52.4)#30 16.9% (+46.4)#1,786
31. Kiester 62.9% 10.9% (+52.0)#31 16.9% (+46.0)#1,813
32. Lewisville 62.5% 10.9% (+51.6)#32 16.9% (+45.6)#1,835
33. Riverland 60.4% 10.9% (+49.5)#33 16.9% (+43.5)#1,975
34. Walters 60.0% 10.9% (+49.1)#34 16.9% (+43.1)#2,014
35. Myrtle 60.0% 10.9% (+49.1)#35 16.9% (+43.1)#2,017
36. Jeffers 58.8% 10.9% (+47.9)#36 16.9% (+41.9)#2,089
37. Iona 57.9% 10.9% (+47.0)#37 16.9% (+41.0)#2,167
38. Granada 57.7% 10.9% (+46.8)#38 16.9% (+40.8)#2,182
39. Chisholm 57.1% 10.9% (+46.2)#39 16.9% (+40.2)#2,238
40. South Haven 55.0% 10.9% (+44.1)#40 16.9% (+38.1)#2,398
41. Odin 54.2% 10.9% (+43.3)#41 16.9% (+37.3)#2,487
42. Delavan 53.8% 10.9% (+43.0)#42 16.9% (+36.9)#2,510
43. Watson 53.3% 10.9% (+42.4)#43 16.9% (+36.4)#2,557
44. Blackduck 52.9% 10.9% (+42.0)#44 16.9% (+36.0)#2,605
45. Browns Valley 52.8% 10.9% (+41.9)#45 16.9% (+35.9)#2,610
46. Vineland 52.6% 10.9% (+41.7)#46 16.9% (+35.7)#2,622
47. Waite Park 52.0% 10.9% (+41.1)#47 16.9% (+35.1)#2,685
48. Raymond 51.9% 10.9% (+41.1)#48 16.9% (+35.0)#2,693
49. White Earth 51.4% 10.9% (+40.5)#49 16.9% (+34.5)#2,749
50. Grove City 51.2% 10.9% (+40.3)#50 16.9% (+34.3)#2,774
51. Freeborn 51.1% 10.9% (+40.2)#51 16.9% (+34.2)#2,784
52. Brooten 50.9% 10.9% (+40.0)#52 16.9% (+34.0)#2,799
53. Coleraine 50.0% 10.9% (+39.1)#53 16.9% (+33.1)#2,854
54. Redby 50.0% 10.9% (+39.1)#54 16.9% (+33.1)#2,862
55. Backus 50.0% 10.9% (+39.1)#55 16.9% (+33.1)#2,906
56. Boyd 50.0% 10.9% (+39.1)#56 16.9% (+33.1)#2,934
57. Leonidas 50.0% 10.9% (+39.1)#57 16.9% (+33.1)#2,979
58. Henriette 50.0% 10.9% (+39.1)#58 16.9% (+33.1)#2,984
59. Halma 50.0% 10.9% (+39.1)#59 16.9% (+33.1)#2,985
60. Chandler 48.6% 10.9% (+37.7)#60 16.9% (+31.7)#3,106
61. Remer 48.1% 10.9% (+37.3)#61 16.9% (+31.2)#3,158
62. Pine River 47.8% 10.9% (+36.9)#62 16.9% (+30.9)#3,201
63. Jasper 47.2% 10.9% (+36.3)#63 16.9% (+30.3)#3,264
64. Belview 47.2% 10.9% (+36.3)#64 16.9% (+30.3)#3,268
65. Clinton 47.1% 10.9% (+36.2)#65 16.9% (+30.2)#3,291
66. Lake Lillian 47.1% 10.9% (+36.2)#66 16.9% (+30.2)#3,295
67. Wendell 47.1% 10.9% (+36.2)#67 16.9% (+30.2)#3,297
68. Bigfork 46.2% 10.9% (+35.3)#68 16.9% (+29.3)#3,402
69. Elmore 46.0% 10.9% (+35.1)#69 16.9% (+29.1)#3,425
70. Lyle 45.9% 10.9% (+35.1)#70 16.9% (+29.0)#3,433
71. Pine Point 45.7% 10.9% (+34.8)#71 16.9% (+28.8)#3,464
72. Osage 45.5% 10.9% (+34.6)#72 16.9% (+28.6)#3,499
73. Lucan 45.5% 10.9% (+34.6)#73 16.9% (+28.6)#3,503
74. Minnesota City 45.5% 10.9% (+34.6)#74 16.9% (+28.6)#3,505
75. Naytahwaush 45.3% 10.9% (+34.4)#75 16.9% (+28.4)#3,525
76. Lastrup 42.9% 10.9% (+32.0)#76 16.9% (+26.0)#3,892
77. Manchester 42.9% 10.9% (+32.0)#77 16.9% (+26.0)#3,896
78. Sacred Heart 41.4% 10.9% (+30.5)#78 16.9% (+24.5)#4,099
79. Holland 40.5% 10.9% (+29.7)#79 16.9% (+23.6)#4,215
80. Walker 40.5% 10.9% (+29.6)#80 16.9% (+23.6)#4,226
81. Geneva 40.5% 10.9% (+29.6)#81 16.9% (+23.6)#4,227
82. Gilbert 40.1% 10.9% (+29.2)#82 16.9% (+23.2)#4,282
83. Royalton 39.7% 10.9% (+28.8)#83 16.9% (+22.8)#4,386
84. Clements 38.9% 10.9% (+28.0)#84 16.9% (+22.0)#4,518
85. Franklin 38.8% 10.9% (+27.9)#85 16.9% (+21.9)#4,530
86. Floodwood 38.2% 10.9% (+27.3)#86 16.9% (+21.3)#4,632
87. Braham 37.8% 10.9% (+26.9)#87 16.9% (+20.9)#4,717
88. Shelly 37.5% 10.9% (+26.6)#88 16.9% (+20.6)#4,784
89. St Joseph 37.4% 10.9% (+26.6)#89 16.9% (+20.5)#4,793
90. Badger 37.3% 10.9% (+26.4)#90 16.9% (+20.4)#4,805
91. Minnesota Lake 37.3% 10.9% (+26.4)#91 16.9% (+20.4)#4,812
92. Mcgregor 37.3% 10.9% (+26.4)#92 16.9% (+20.4)#4,819
93. Kenyon 37.2% 10.9% (+26.3)#93 16.9% (+20.3)#4,821
94. Walnut Grove 37.2% 10.9% (+26.3)#94 16.9% (+20.3)#4,829
95. Ponemah 37.1% 10.9% (+26.2)#95 16.9% (+20.2)#4,846
96. Fairhaven 37.0% 10.9% (+26.1)#96 16.9% (+20.1)#4,855
97. Goodhue 37.0% 10.9% (+26.1)#97 16.9% (+20.1)#4,870
98. Ruthton 36.8% 10.9% (+26.0)#98 16.9% (+19.9)#4,889
99. Keewatin 36.8% 10.9% (+25.9)#99 16.9% (+19.9)#4,897
100. Jackson 36.6% 10.9% (+25.8)#100 16.9% (+19.7)#4,920

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota?
Perley has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the State of Minnesota?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota is 10.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.