Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Boys 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma

City Child Poverty (Boys) vs State vs National
1. Flint Creek 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#74
2. Hanson 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#381
3. Bee 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#418
4. Oak Hill-Piney 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#423
5. Yeager 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#5 16.9% (+83.1)#448
6. Greenfield 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#6 16.9% (+83.1)#465
7. Platter 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#7 16.9% (+83.1)#487
8. Smithville 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#8 16.9% (+83.1)#499
9. Hoyt 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#9 16.9% (+83.1)#500
10. Blue 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#10 16.9% (+83.1)#508
11. Headrick 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#11 16.9% (+83.1)#528
12. Paradise Hill 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#12 16.9% (+83.1)#534
13. Blanco 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#13 16.9% (+83.1)#548
14. Mulberry 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#14 16.9% (+83.1)#563
15. Oakwood 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#15 16.9% (+83.1)#578
16. Hendrix 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#16 16.9% (+83.1)#581
17. Emet 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#17 16.9% (+83.1)#598
18. Whippoorwill 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#18 16.9% (+83.1)#608
19. Badger Lee 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#19 16.9% (+83.1)#615
20. Peckham 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#20 16.9% (+83.1)#625
21. Elohim 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#21 16.9% (+83.1)#631
22. Rosston 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#22 16.9% (+83.1)#641
23. Mutual 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#23 16.9% (+83.1)#645
24. Friendship 100.0% 20.6% (+79.4)#24 16.9% (+83.1)#655
25. Moffett 85.7% 20.6% (+65.1)#25 16.9% (+68.8)#825
26. Devol 84.2% 20.6% (+63.6)#26 16.9% (+67.3)#865
27. Butler 84.1% 20.6% (+63.4)#27 16.9% (+67.2)#868
28. Kendrick 83.3% 20.6% (+62.7)#28 16.9% (+66.4)#904
29. Colony 80.0% 20.6% (+59.4)#29 16.9% (+63.1)#1,008
30. Atwood 80.0% 20.6% (+59.4)#30 16.9% (+63.1)#1,016
31. Keota 76.0% 20.6% (+55.4)#31 16.9% (+59.1)#1,150
32. Fitzhugh 75.0% 20.6% (+54.4)#32 16.9% (+58.1)#1,184
33. Belfonte 75.0% 20.6% (+54.4)#33 16.9% (+58.1)#1,186
34. New Alluwe 75.0% 20.6% (+54.4)#34 16.9% (+58.1)#1,199
35. Amorita 75.0% 20.6% (+54.4)#35 16.9% (+58.1)#1,203
36. Boswell 74.6% 20.6% (+54.0)#36 16.9% (+57.7)#1,212
37. Gans 73.9% 20.6% (+53.3)#37 16.9% (+57.0)#1,237
38. River Bottom 73.7% 20.6% (+53.1)#38 16.9% (+56.8)#1,247
39. Toppers 73.6% 20.6% (+53.0)#39 16.9% (+56.7)#1,249
40. Dover 72.7% 20.6% (+52.1)#40 16.9% (+55.8)#1,293
41. Boley 71.4% 20.6% (+50.8)#41 16.9% (+54.5)#1,340
42. Little Rock 71.4% 20.6% (+50.8)#42 16.9% (+54.5)#1,348
43. Felt 71.4% 20.6% (+50.8)#43 16.9% (+54.5)#1,357
44. White Eagle 70.1% 20.6% (+49.5)#44 16.9% (+53.2)#1,413
45. Okeene 68.4% 20.6% (+47.8)#45 16.9% (+51.5)#1,496
46. Mccurtain 68.1% 20.6% (+47.5)#46 16.9% (+51.2)#1,505
47. Temple 68.0% 20.6% (+47.4)#47 16.9% (+51.1)#1,511
48. Pickett 67.2% 20.6% (+46.6)#48 16.9% (+50.3)#1,553
49. Nash 66.7% 20.6% (+46.1)#49 16.9% (+49.8)#1,595
50. Peoria 66.7% 20.6% (+46.1)#50 16.9% (+49.8)#1,603
51. Clayton 66.2% 20.6% (+45.6)#51 16.9% (+49.3)#1,630
52. Bowring 65.0% 20.6% (+44.4)#52 16.9% (+48.1)#1,691
53. Yale 64.8% 20.6% (+44.2)#53 16.9% (+47.9)#1,696
54. Tyrone 64.7% 20.6% (+44.1)#54 16.9% (+47.8)#1,701
55. Spavinaw 64.3% 20.6% (+43.7)#55 16.9% (+47.4)#1,729
56. Wapanucka 63.3% 20.6% (+42.7)#56 16.9% (+46.4)#1,785
57. Martha 63.2% 20.6% (+42.5)#57 16.9% (+46.3)#1,796
58. Titanic 62.5% 20.6% (+41.9)#58 16.9% (+45.6)#1,832
59. Big Cabin 62.5% 20.6% (+41.9)#59 16.9% (+45.6)#1,840
60. Drummond 61.7% 20.6% (+41.1)#60 16.9% (+44.8)#1,883
61. Taloga 61.3% 20.6% (+40.7)#61 16.9% (+44.4)#1,915
62. Park Hill 60.9% 20.6% (+40.3)#62 16.9% (+44.0)#1,938
63. Twin Oaks 60.6% 20.6% (+40.0)#63 16.9% (+43.7)#1,956
64. Peggs 60.4% 20.6% (+39.8)#64 16.9% (+43.5)#1,967
65. Webbers Falls 60.0% 20.6% (+39.4)#65 16.9% (+43.1)#1,991
66. Blackburn 60.0% 20.6% (+39.4)#66 16.9% (+43.1)#2,010
67. Langston 59.4% 20.6% (+38.8)#67 16.9% (+42.5)#2,053
68. Gregory 58.9% 20.6% (+38.3)#68 16.9% (+42.0)#2,082
69. North Miami 58.7% 20.6% (+38.1)#69 16.9% (+41.8)#2,103
70. Foss 58.3% 20.6% (+37.7)#70 16.9% (+41.4)#2,137
71. Lima 58.3% 20.6% (+37.7)#71 16.9% (+41.4)#2,138
72. Stuart 57.7% 20.6% (+37.1)#72 16.9% (+40.8)#2,183
73. Grandview 57.6% 20.6% (+36.9)#73 16.9% (+40.7)#2,188
74. Loco 57.1% 20.6% (+36.5)#74 16.9% (+40.2)#2,235
75. Colcord 57.0% 20.6% (+36.4)#75 16.9% (+40.1)#2,241
76. Perkins 56.6% 20.6% (+36.0)#76 16.9% (+39.7)#2,278
77. Zena 55.6% 20.6% (+34.9)#77 16.9% (+38.7)#2,361
78. Langley 55.2% 20.6% (+34.6)#78 16.9% (+38.3)#2,379
79. Eldorado 54.8% 20.6% (+34.2)#79 16.9% (+37.9)#2,410
80. Hobart 54.7% 20.6% (+34.1)#80 16.9% (+37.8)#2,422
81. Vici 54.6% 20.6% (+34.0)#81 16.9% (+37.7)#2,429
82. Watts 54.5% 20.6% (+33.9)#82 16.9% (+37.6)#2,445
83. Osage 54.5% 20.6% (+33.9)#83 16.9% (+37.6)#2,449
84. Salina 53.8% 20.6% (+33.2)#84 16.9% (+36.9)#2,515
85. Tonkawa Tribal Housing 53.4% 20.6% (+32.8)#85 16.9% (+36.5)#2,541
86. Marland 53.3% 20.6% (+32.7)#86 16.9% (+36.4)#2,555
87. Chandler 52.2% 20.6% (+31.6)#87 16.9% (+35.3)#2,668
88. Bennington 52.2% 20.6% (+31.6)#88 16.9% (+35.3)#2,673
89. Wynnewood 51.8% 20.6% (+31.2)#89 16.9% (+34.9)#2,704
90. Dustin 51.6% 20.6% (+31.0)#90 16.9% (+34.7)#2,724
91. Erick 51.6% 20.6% (+31.0)#91 16.9% (+34.7)#2,730
92. Okemah 51.5% 20.6% (+30.9)#92 16.9% (+34.6)#2,740
93. Chelsea 51.4% 20.6% (+30.8)#93 16.9% (+34.5)#2,754
94. Carmen 51.0% 20.6% (+30.4)#94 16.9% (+34.1)#2,793
95. Sallisaw 50.9% 20.6% (+30.3)#95 16.9% (+34.0)#2,797
96. Tipton 50.6% 20.6% (+30.0)#96 16.9% (+33.7)#2,815
97. Ryan 50.5% 20.6% (+29.9)#97 16.9% (+33.6)#2,827
98. Commerce 50.4% 20.6% (+29.8)#98 16.9% (+33.5)#2,830
99. Carlisle 50.0% 20.6% (+29.4)#99 16.9% (+33.1)#2,886
100. Arpelar 50.0% 20.6% (+29.4)#100 16.9% (+33.1)#2,908

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Flint Creek has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the State of Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma is 20.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.