Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Boys 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Iowa

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Iowa

City Child Poverty (Boys) vs State vs National
1. Castalia 100.0% 13.4% (+86.6)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#431
2. Oto 100.0% 13.4% (+86.6)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#540
3. Swan 100.0% 13.4% (+86.6)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#583
4. Aspinwall 100.0% 13.4% (+86.6)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#643
5. Woodburn 90.9% 13.4% (+77.5)#5 16.9% (+74.0)#717
6. Osterdock 85.7% 13.4% (+72.3)#6 16.9% (+68.8)#823
7. Kiron 84.7% 13.4% (+71.3)#7 16.9% (+67.8)#848
8. Casey 84.2% 13.4% (+70.8)#8 16.9% (+67.3)#862
9. Zwingle 83.3% 13.4% (+69.9)#9 16.9% (+66.4)#905
10. Grant 83.3% 13.4% (+69.9)#10 16.9% (+66.4)#907
11. Meservey 81.8% 13.4% (+68.4)#11 16.9% (+64.9)#943
12. Bradgate 80.0% 13.4% (+66.6)#12 16.9% (+63.1)#1,010
13. Galt 80.0% 13.4% (+66.6)#13 16.9% (+63.1)#1,020
14. Moorhead 78.9% 13.4% (+65.5)#14 16.9% (+62.0)#1,052
15. Decatur City 78.6% 13.4% (+65.2)#15 16.9% (+61.7)#1,068
16. Grand River 77.8% 13.4% (+64.4)#16 16.9% (+60.9)#1,093
17. Aurora 76.5% 13.4% (+63.1)#17 16.9% (+59.6)#1,135
18. Marathon 75.0% 13.4% (+61.6)#18 16.9% (+58.1)#1,188
19. Soldier 75.0% 13.4% (+61.6)#19 16.9% (+58.1)#1,195
20. Delaware 75.0% 13.4% (+61.6)#20 16.9% (+58.1)#1,198
21. Chelsea 73.5% 13.4% (+60.1)#21 16.9% (+56.6)#1,253
22. Ackworth 72.7% 13.4% (+59.3)#22 16.9% (+55.8)#1,296
23. Melrose 71.4% 13.4% (+58.0)#23 16.9% (+54.5)#1,349
24. Burr Oak 70.0% 13.4% (+56.6)#24 16.9% (+53.1)#1,422
25. Melvin 68.9% 13.4% (+55.5)#25 16.9% (+52.0)#1,472
26. Thor 67.7% 13.4% (+54.3)#26 16.9% (+50.8)#1,530
27. Victor 67.3% 13.4% (+53.9)#27 16.9% (+50.4)#1,547
28. Ferguson 66.7% 13.4% (+53.3)#28 16.9% (+49.8)#1,604
29. Morley 66.7% 13.4% (+53.3)#29 16.9% (+49.8)#1,614
30. Coppock 66.7% 13.4% (+53.3)#30 16.9% (+49.8)#1,615
31. Bagley 60.0% 13.4% (+46.6)#31 16.9% (+43.1)#1,998
32. Havelock 60.0% 13.4% (+46.6)#32 16.9% (+43.1)#2,002
33. Stockton 60.0% 13.4% (+46.6)#33 16.9% (+43.1)#2,003
34. Randalia 60.0% 13.4% (+46.6)#34 16.9% (+43.1)#2,015
35. Nodaway 60.0% 13.4% (+46.6)#35 16.9% (+43.1)#2,016
36. Humeston 59.0% 13.4% (+45.6)#36 16.9% (+42.1)#2,075
37. Marquette 58.8% 13.4% (+45.4)#37 16.9% (+41.9)#2,087
38. Lockridge 58.1% 13.4% (+44.7)#38 16.9% (+41.2)#2,152
39. Oakville 55.6% 13.4% (+42.1)#39 16.9% (+38.7)#2,359
40. Andover 55.0% 13.4% (+41.6)#40 16.9% (+38.1)#2,400
41. Lorimor 54.4% 13.4% (+41.0)#41 16.9% (+37.5)#2,465
42. Allerton 53.7% 13.4% (+40.3)#42 16.9% (+36.8)#2,524
43. Hillsboro 52.9% 13.4% (+39.5)#43 16.9% (+36.0)#2,593
44. Alexander 52.4% 13.4% (+39.0)#44 16.9% (+35.5)#2,655
45. Parnell 50.0% 13.4% (+36.6)#45 16.9% (+33.1)#2,926
46. Pilot Mound 50.0% 13.4% (+36.6)#46 16.9% (+33.1)#2,942
47. St Donatus 50.0% 13.4% (+36.6)#47 16.9% (+33.1)#2,949
48. Turin 50.0% 13.4% (+36.6)#48 16.9% (+33.1)#2,950
49. Brayton 50.0% 13.4% (+36.6)#49 16.9% (+33.1)#2,958
50. Story City 49.9% 13.4% (+36.5)#50 16.9% (+33.0)#2,989
51. Ringsted 49.1% 13.4% (+35.7)#51 16.9% (+32.2)#3,041
52. Terril 48.4% 13.4% (+35.0)#52 16.9% (+31.5)#3,129
53. Burt 48.3% 13.4% (+34.9)#53 16.9% (+31.4)#3,135
54. Lansing 46.9% 13.4% (+33.5)#54 16.9% (+30.0)#3,322
55. Malcom 46.2% 13.4% (+32.7)#55 16.9% (+29.3)#3,406
56. Rake 44.8% 13.4% (+31.4)#56 16.9% (+27.9)#3,587
57. Marne 44.4% 13.4% (+31.0)#57 16.9% (+27.5)#3,645
58. Bode 43.7% 13.4% (+30.3)#58 16.9% (+26.8)#3,740
59. Bayard 43.3% 13.4% (+29.9)#59 16.9% (+26.4)#3,804
60. Kimballton 43.2% 13.4% (+29.8)#60 16.9% (+26.3)#3,818
61. Gilman 42.9% 13.4% (+29.4)#61 16.9% (+26.0)#3,862
62. Rome 42.9% 13.4% (+29.4)#62 16.9% (+26.0)#3,895
63. Searsboro 42.3% 13.4% (+28.9)#63 16.9% (+25.4)#3,959
64. Olin 42.3% 13.4% (+28.8)#64 16.9% (+25.3)#3,965
65. West Chester 41.7% 13.4% (+28.3)#65 16.9% (+24.8)#4,056
66. Royal 40.7% 13.4% (+27.3)#66 16.9% (+23.8)#4,188
67. Zearing 40.5% 13.4% (+27.1)#67 16.9% (+23.6)#4,213
68. Lu Verne 40.5% 13.4% (+27.1)#68 16.9% (+23.6)#4,228
69. Armstrong 40.3% 13.4% (+26.9)#69 16.9% (+23.4)#4,265
70. West Burlington 40.1% 13.4% (+26.7)#70 16.9% (+23.2)#4,275
71. Churdan 40.0% 13.4% (+26.6)#71 16.9% (+23.1)#4,311
72. Westphalia 40.0% 13.4% (+26.6)#72 16.9% (+23.1)#4,335
73. St Anthony 40.0% 13.4% (+26.6)#73 16.9% (+23.1)#4,341
74. Maquoketa 39.8% 13.4% (+26.3)#74 16.9% (+22.9)#4,373
75. Onslow 39.1% 13.4% (+25.7)#75 16.9% (+22.2)#4,475
76. Chariton 38.9% 13.4% (+25.5)#76 16.9% (+22.0)#4,506
77. Belmond 38.3% 13.4% (+24.9)#77 16.9% (+21.4)#4,615
78. Milton 38.3% 13.4% (+24.9)#78 16.9% (+21.4)#4,621
79. Audubon 37.7% 13.4% (+24.3)#79 16.9% (+20.8)#4,731
80. Emmetsburg 37.1% 13.4% (+23.7)#80 16.9% (+20.2)#4,838
81. Early 37.1% 13.4% (+23.7)#81 16.9% (+20.2)#4,840
82. Alden 37.1% 13.4% (+23.7)#82 16.9% (+20.2)#4,843
83. Postville 36.9% 13.4% (+23.5)#83 16.9% (+20.0)#4,873
84. Livermore 36.8% 13.4% (+23.4)#84 16.9% (+19.9)#4,883
85. Farmersburg 36.6% 13.4% (+23.2)#85 16.9% (+19.7)#4,934
86. Dedham 36.4% 13.4% (+23.0)#86 16.9% (+19.5)#4,980
87. Centralia 36.4% 13.4% (+23.0)#87 16.9% (+19.5)#4,987
88. Frederika 36.1% 13.4% (+22.7)#88 16.9% (+19.2)#5,033
89. Boyden 36.1% 13.4% (+22.7)#89 16.9% (+19.2)#5,034
90. Delhi 36.0% 13.4% (+22.6)#90 16.9% (+19.1)#5,060
91. Persia 35.9% 13.4% (+22.5)#91 16.9% (+19.0)#5,080
92. New Hartford 35.7% 13.4% (+22.3)#92 16.9% (+18.8)#5,116
93. Scranton 35.7% 13.4% (+22.3)#93 16.9% (+18.8)#5,120
94. Sibley 35.4% 13.4% (+22.0)#94 16.9% (+18.5)#5,198
95. Orient 35.0% 13.4% (+21.6)#95 16.9% (+18.1)#5,287
96. Goose Lake 35.0% 13.4% (+21.6)#96 16.9% (+18.1)#5,290
97. Kelley 34.9% 13.4% (+21.5)#97 16.9% (+18.0)#5,318
98. Cushing 34.8% 13.4% (+21.4)#98 16.9% (+17.9)#5,348
99. Andrew 34.3% 13.4% (+20.9)#99 16.9% (+17.4)#5,447
100. Villisca 34.0% 13.4% (+20.6)#100 16.9% (+17.1)#5,503

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Iowa are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
90.9%
#6
85.7%
#7
84.7%
#8
84.2%
#9
83.3%
#10
83.3%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Iowa?
Castalia has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Iowa with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the State of Iowa?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Iowa is 13.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.