Chickasaw vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,198,236 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.246. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 30.6 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $119,756, a difference of 53.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $105,335, a difference of 50.5%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $54,264, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $69,174, a difference of 28.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $57,931, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 60.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 51.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 44.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.70%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 47.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.47%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 92.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 104.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 100.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 85.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 85.2%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 80.7%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.7%).