Chickasaw vs Peruvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,882,116 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.755% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 755.3 Peruvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $90,261, a difference of 28.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $105,070, a difference of 27.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $98,886, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.1%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $55,659, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,766, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 42.1%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 38.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.30, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.0%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.1%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.19%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 63.4%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.3%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.3%).