Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Serbia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Serbia

Fair
Excellent
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,096
SOCIAL INDEX
88.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
31st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Serbia Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,573,639 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.055% in Immigrants from Serbia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 55.5 Immigrants from Serbia.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Serbia Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $50,810, a difference of 39.3%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $113,463, a difference of 32.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $103,155, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $63,387, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,321, a difference of 19.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Serbia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$50,810
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$113,463
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$91,730
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$51,557
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$60,600
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$43,385
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$53,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$103,155
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$107,569
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$63,387
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Fair
26.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 46.6%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 42.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 21.9%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Serbia
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.9%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.98%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Serbia
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 5.2%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Serbia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Fair
36.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.9%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.48%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.8%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Serbia
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
61.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
25.5%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
28.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 51.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 48.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Serbia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
11.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
51.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 72.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 61.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Serbia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
92.4%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
69.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
63.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
51.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
44.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 64.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 59.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.2%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Serbia Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Serbia
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
45.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%