Chickasaw vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,860,966 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.472. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 74.7 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $94,990, a difference of 35.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $111,051, a difference of 35.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $104,993, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,369, a difference of 21.5%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $42,133, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 39.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.81%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 27.5%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 26.8%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.92%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.71%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 56.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 52.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.24%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.3%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 59.2%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 6.9%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.7%).