Chickasaw vs American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,682,212 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Americans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.105% in Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 104.6 Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $90,536, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $48,860, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $84,791, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $55,527, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $35,777, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 13.6%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.56%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 0.31%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.86%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.24%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.7%).