Chickasaw vs Kenyan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,240,319 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Kenyans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.647. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Kenyans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 6.3 Kenyans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $98,970, a difference of 20.4%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $84,085, a difference of 20.1%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $101,417, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 11.1%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $53,647, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $60,514, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 32.1%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 26.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.21%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.59%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.83%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 34.2%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.050%), 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kenyan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 57.5%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.9%).