Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,865,178 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 4.1 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 20.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,722, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $89,673, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,030, a difference of 0.55%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $50,474, a difference of 5.5%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $92,837, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 35.0%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.64%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 203.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 75.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 21.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 45.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 65.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 82.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 80.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.5%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.1%).