Chickasaw vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,591,693 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 47.8 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $119,496, a difference of 53.3%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $105,262, a difference of 50.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $122,343, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $58,239, a difference of 30.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $70,238, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 62.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 44.4%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 43.6%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 78.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 94.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 92.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 79.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.21%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 82.0%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 73.7%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.2%).