Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,741,597 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.689. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 58.0 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,327, a difference of 19.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $97,400, a difference of 18.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $91,337, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,908, a difference of 10.6%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $60,217, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 25.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.9%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.070%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 59.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.24%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.8%).