Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,867,596 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.560. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 35.4 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 68.0%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $41,932, a difference of 21.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,538, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $85,552, a difference of 4.1%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $89,249, a difference of 4.6%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $50,279, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 53.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 48.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and female poverty (15.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 54.4%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 46.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 51.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.3%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 22.4%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), family households (64.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 376.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 171.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 144.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 47.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 105.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 144.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 62.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 104.2%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 84.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 68.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 6.8%).