Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Honduras Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,475,717 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Honduras within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in Immigrants from Honduras. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 60.6 Immigrants from Honduras.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 15.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $48,267, a difference of 7.8%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $45,787, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,475 compared to $36,665, a difference of 0.52%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $82,697, a difference of 0.61%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,647, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 0.83%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.2%), currently married (46.6% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.37%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.99%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 49.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 87.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 60.7%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.9%).