Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Cabo Verde
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Cabo Verde

Fair
Poor
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,391
SOCIAL INDEX
11.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
312th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Cabo Verde Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,561,227 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cabo Verde within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.218% in Immigrants from Cabo Verde. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 218.5 Immigrants from Cabo Verde.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Cabo Verde Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 15.3%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $46,654, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,520, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $83,542, a difference of 1.6%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $87,830, a difference of 2.9%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $50,009, a difference of 4.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Cabo Verde
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Tragic
$38,540
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Tragic
$87,830
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Tragic
$73,515
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Tragic
$43,963
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Tragic
$50,009
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Tragic
$38,208
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Tragic
$50,520
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Tragic
$84,304
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Tragic
$83,542
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Tragic
$46,654
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
23.6%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 82.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 58.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.58%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Cabo Verde
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.1%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
11.6%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.7%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
16.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
16.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
19.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
20.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
13.9%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
22.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
16.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
23.8%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 67.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 66.4%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.2%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Cabo Verde
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Cabo Verde
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
44.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
82.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 36.0%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.4% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Cabo Verde
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
36.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Tragic
37.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Tragic
42.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 134.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 95.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 13.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 36.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 63.6%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Cabo Verde
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
18.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
81.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
43.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
13.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
3.8%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 108.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.70%), 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Cabo Verde
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
94.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
94.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
93.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
92.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
90.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
89.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
85.8%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Tragic
83.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
78.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Tragic
53.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Tragic
48.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
36.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Tragic
29.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 50.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.2%), and male disability (15.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Cabo Verde
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
26.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
52.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
3.1%