Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,764,688 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Immigrants from Sudan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $41,986, a difference of 15.1%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $97,737, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $46,791, a difference of 4.5%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $51,489, a difference of 7.6%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $44,767, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.9%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.86%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.8%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 45.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.7%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.8%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.3%).