Immigrants from Yemen vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,336,790 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Yemen communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Yemen within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.127% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Yemen corresponds to a decrease of 126.8 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($73,043 compared to $119,756, a difference of 63.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,575 compared to $122,178, a difference of 63.8%), and median family income ($77,457 compared to $125,540, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 26.7%), householder income under 25 years ($43,591 compared to $57,931, a difference of 32.9%), and median female earnings ($34,693 compared to $46,972, a difference of 35.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (12.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 158.1%), receiving food stamps (21.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 126.3%), and family poverty (17.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 122.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (27.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 36.6%), and single father poverty (20.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 37.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 116.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (16.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 112.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (8.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 34.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.9% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 46.2%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 28.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (29.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and average family size (3.60 compared to 3.23, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.4%), no vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 28.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 115.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 97.5%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 83.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (95.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.7%), nursery school (95.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (95.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 61.3%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.7%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.91% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 6.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 11.1%).