Chickasaw vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,949,338 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 6.9 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $47,848, a difference of 6.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $86,125, a difference of 4.8%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $72,682, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,133, a difference of 0.75%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,742, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 7.9%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 0.30%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 34.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.7%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.9%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.12%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.72%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.13%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 3.9%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.70%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 1.8%).