Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,682,419 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.871. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 83.8 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $49,893, a difference of 36.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $112,175, a difference of 36.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $105,089, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $52,638, a difference of 17.6%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $41,771, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 47.7%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.3%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.46%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 0.19%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 52.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 13.5%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.3%).