Chickasaw vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,955,093 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.548. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.294% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 294.4 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $85,818, a difference of 22.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $99,943, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $94,423, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 8.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $59,656, a difference of 11.0%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $54,168, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 26.7%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.73%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.6%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.93%), currently married (46.6% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 48.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 64.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 57.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.3%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.6%).