Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Denmark
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Denmark

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,985
SOCIAL INDEX
77.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
95th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Denmark Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,303,140 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Denmark. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 13.0 Immigrants from Denmark.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Denmark Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $53,799, a difference of 47.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $110,363, a difference of 41.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $116,000, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $52,612, a difference of 17.5%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $43,646, a difference of 26.8%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Denmark
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$53,799
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$120,445
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$98,510
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$53,186
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$64,625
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$43,646
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Good
$52,612
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$110,363
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$116,000
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$68,801
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
28.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 36.2%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 13.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Denmark
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Excellent
20.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.6%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.82%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Denmark
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Average
5.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Denmark
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Fair
36.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Fair
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Poor
82.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Denmark
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
29.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 41.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 13.2%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Denmark
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Poor
11.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Average
19.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Average
6.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 91.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 82.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 71.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Denmark
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
92.5%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
65.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
53.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
45.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
19.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.8%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 55.8%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 54.1%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Denmark Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Denmark
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%