Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Nicaragua
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,407
SOCIAL INDEX
31.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
221st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Nicaragua Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,411,943 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.799. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.271% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 271.4 Immigrants from Nicaragua.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,266, a difference of 19.0%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $76,784, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,482, a difference of 0.74%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,737, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $52,085, a difference of 3.2%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $38,065 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $88,267 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $76,784 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $41,737 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $47,482 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $36,023 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,266 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $84,914 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $89,108 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $52,085 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 23.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 51.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 48.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.63%), poverty (14.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 17.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Good 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 17.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 17.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 31.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Average 82.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.7%), currently married (46.6% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.22%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 67.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 44.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.37 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 43.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 38.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Good 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Average 55.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Excellent 20.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 81.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 93.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 92.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 91.3% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 89.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 88.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 86.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 83.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 79.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 57.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 52.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 40.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 31.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 67.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.1%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.0%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |