Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Immigrants from China
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,702,957 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.098% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to a decrease of 98.1 Immigrants from China.
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 38.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $122,178, a difference of 33.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,856 compared to $119,756, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $57,931, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $46,972, a difference of 14.7%), and median earnings ($45,820 compared to $56,638, a difference of 23.6%).
| Income Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from China |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,655 | Exceptional $54,264 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $94,466 | Exceptional $125,540 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $80,402 | Exceptional $105,335 |
| Median Earnings | Fair $45,820 | Exceptional $56,638 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,446 | Exceptional $67,353 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,958 | Exceptional $46,972 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,631 | Exceptional $57,931 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,856 | Exceptional $119,756 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,357 | Exceptional $122,178 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,327 | Exceptional $69,174 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.3% | Poor 26.7% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 67.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 44.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.7%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and single father poverty (17.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 14.1%).
| Poverty Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from China |
| Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Families | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Males | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 10.7% |
| Females | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Average 20.2% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Single Mothers | Fair 29.6% | Exceptional 26.1% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.0% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 11.5% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.0% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.7%), and male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
| Unemployment Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from China |
| Unemployment | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Tragic 6.7% | Good 5.2% |
| Females | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.6% | Average 11.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.6% | Good 17.5% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.9% | Fair 10.4% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.2% | Average 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Fair 5.4% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Poor 5.2% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.1% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from China |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Excellent 65.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 79.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 31.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.5% | Tragic 71.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.9% | Average 84.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.5% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 52.4%), births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 47.8%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Family Structure Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from China |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.6% | Excellent 64.7% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Average 27.4% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.5% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 56.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 41.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 11.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 26.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 33.7%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from China |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 23.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 76.3% | Tragic 84.9% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 40.9% | Tragic 51.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 18.2% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.3% | Poor 6.0% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 102.0%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 68.4%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Education Level Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from China |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Tragic 95.0% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 93.7% | Tragic 94.3% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 92.4% | Tragic 93.2% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Fair 92.3% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.4% | Good 91.3% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 86.9% | Good 89.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 86.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.1% | Exceptional 70.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.6% | Exceptional 55.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.7% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Master's Degree | Fair 14.4% | Exceptional 21.2% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 30.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.0%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.6%).
| Disability Metric | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from China |
| Disability | Average 11.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Males | Excellent 11.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 0.96% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 23.9% | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.7% | Exceptional 46.3% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |