Chickasaw vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,557,412 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 28.3 Sri Lankans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $93,093, a difference of 33.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $108,270, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $101,960, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 5.2%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $56,136, a difference of 17.4%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $40,496, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 42.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 41.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.21%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 25.5%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.35, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.20%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 79.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.9%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.23%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 58.2%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.5%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.5%).