Finnish vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 360,521,715 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to a decrease of 6.7 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $119,756, a difference of 26.6%), median household income ($83,607 compared to $105,335, a difference of 26.0%), and per capita income ($43,461 compared to $54,264, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $57,931, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $69,174, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 22.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 22.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.1%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 41.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.1%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 28.3%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.56%), currently married (48.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 97.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 75.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 69.9%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 65.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.4%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.020%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.0%).