Chickasaw vs Eastern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,877,024 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Eastern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 4.5 Eastern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $55,780, a difference of 52.9%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $125,546, a difference of 47.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $114,523, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,066, a difference of 20.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $70,470, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 49.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 49.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 35.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 48.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 111.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 86.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 84.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 61.7%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 61.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.9%).