Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Immigrants from China
7,346
SOCIAL INDEX
70.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
121st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Northern Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 306,754,165 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.479. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.312% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to a decrease of 311.8 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,232 compared to $119,756, a difference of 20.7%), median household income ($90,026 compared to $105,335, a difference of 17.0%), and per capita income ($46,531 compared to $54,264, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $57,931, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,522 compared to $69,174, a difference of 10.6%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,531 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,161 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,026 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,648 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $58,008 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,084 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,232 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,430 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,522 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.2% | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 20.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.8% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.5% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.6% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.9% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.2%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.22 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.5% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.5% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.4% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.3% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 45.8%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.0%), and master's degree (17.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (89.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.9% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.5% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.4% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.4% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.3% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.2% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.9% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.7% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 20.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.91%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.7% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |