Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,035,946 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $57,953, a difference of 58.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $115,947, a difference of 48.8%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $126,620, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $56,660, a difference of 26.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $69,164, a difference of 28.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 49.0%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 43.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 75.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 105.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 85.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 82.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 66.7%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.1%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.1%).