Bhutanese vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 406,900,007 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.264. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.052% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 52.4 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $119,756, a difference of 9.3%), median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $67,353, a difference of 9.1%), and per capita income ($49,894 compared to $54,264, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $57,931, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $122,178, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 25.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.21%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.69%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.60%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.66%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 73.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.0%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.3% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 0.72%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 21.5%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.3%).