Chickasaw vs Mongolian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Mongolian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Mongolians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Mongolian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,933,756 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 9.9 Mongolians.
Chickasaw vs Mongolian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $111,602, a difference of 35.8%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $49,173, a difference of 34.8%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $93,971, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $52,540, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $65,326, a difference of 21.6%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Mongolian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $49,173 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $114,553 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $93,971 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $51,038 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $60,350 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $42,542 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Good $52,540 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $104,578 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $111,602 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $65,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Poor 26.6% |
Chickasaw vs Mongolian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.5%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 13.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Mongolian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Average 12.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Excellent 8.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Excellent 15.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Chickasaw vs Mongolian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.68%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Mongolian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chickasaw vs Mongolian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Mongolian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Chickasaw vs Mongolian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 30.0%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.33%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.86%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Mongolian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Fair 46.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Chickasaw vs Mongolian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 67.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 22.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Mongolian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 87.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 52.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 18.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw vs Mongolian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 82.8%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 82.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 69.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.11%), 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Mongolian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Average 95.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Good 94.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Excellent 93.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Excellent 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 89.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 53.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 45.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Chickasaw vs Mongolian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.4%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.3%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Mongolian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |