Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,694,533 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.283. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 24.6 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 33.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,757, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $48,535, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $82,513, a difference of 0.39%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,119, a difference of 1.1%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $37,254, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 56.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 54.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 2.0%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 18.9%), currently married (46.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 149.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 67.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 14.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 33.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 52.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 71.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 72.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 50.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.9%).