Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kuwait Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,925,636 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Kuwait. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 13.3 Immigrants from Kuwait.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $106,285, a difference of 29.3%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $109,731, a difference of 28.6%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $46,543, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $48,126, a difference of 7.5%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $41,055, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 32.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.090%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.4%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 70.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.3%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 62.1%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 61.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.7%).