Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,609,466 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 35.4 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 19.0%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,391, a difference of 11.6%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $77,631, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $56,615, a difference of 5.4%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $50,408, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $84,235, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 19.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.7%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.99%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 55.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.7%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.30%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.3%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.0%).