Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,221,889 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.184% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 183.9 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $46,213, a difference of 26.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $88,388, a difference of 26.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,412, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,354, a difference of 16.1%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $55,954, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 35.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 32.7%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.5%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.24%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 39.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 46.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.1%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.8%).