Chickasaw vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,560,757 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 12.2 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $101,580, a difference of 23.6%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $86,498, a difference of 23.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,610, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.6%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $51,389, a difference of 7.4%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $44,206, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 40.0%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 37.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.4%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.18%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.5%), associate's degree (38.6% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.080%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.0%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.0%).