Chickasaw vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from El Salvador
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from El Salvador
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,475
SOCIAL INDEX
22.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
255th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,703,840 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 6.2 Immigrants from El Salvador.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from El Salvador Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,599, a difference of 22.0%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 19.2%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $81,213, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,973, a difference of 0.30%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $42,413, a difference of 4.3%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $38,394, a difference of 5.3%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $38,394 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $92,545 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $81,213 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $42,413 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $47,973 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $36,673 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,599 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $86,913 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $93,176 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $58,226 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 26.9%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 20.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Excellent 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from El Salvador Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from El Salvador Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from El Salvador |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.9%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.49, a difference of 9.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 0.36%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (64.4% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 67.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 44.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 43.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 36.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from El Salvador |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Average 55.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from El Salvador Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 128.8%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and 10th grade (94.1% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 0.52%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from El Salvador |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 95.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 95.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 94.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 94.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 93.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 90.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 90.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 89.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 86.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 85.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 83.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 80.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 77.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 56.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 51.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 38.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 31.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from El Salvador Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 73.5%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 59.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.9%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 2.5% |