Chickasaw vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,577,344 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.398. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 17.1 Cheyenne.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 16.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $76,362, a difference of 7.6%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $81,385, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,096, a difference of 0.68%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $40,233, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $45,275, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 62.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 33.9%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.3%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 148.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 90.6%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 89.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 49.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.0%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 18.2%), female disability (15.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 0.61%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 2.9%).