Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bolivia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Bolivia

Fair
Excellent
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,718
SOCIAL INDEX
84.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
55th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bolivia Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,049,622 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.548. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Immigrants from Bolivia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 19.6 Immigrants from Bolivia.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Bolivia Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $101,394, a difference of 44.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $117,731, a difference of 43.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $108,128, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.5%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $60,088, a difference of 25.6%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $43,467, a difference of 26.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bolivia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$48,970
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$117,912
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$101,394
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$51,605
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$60,088
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$43,467
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$59,389
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$108,128
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$117,731
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$73,434
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Fair
26.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 57.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.0%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.41%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bolivia
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
13.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bolivia
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bolivia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
68.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 27.1%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (64.4% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.31, a difference of 3.8%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bolivia
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
66.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
29.3%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
28.6%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.8%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bolivia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
57.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
6.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 67.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 63.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bolivia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
92.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
91.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Poor
90.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Average
85.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
67.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
51.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
44.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 84.7%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 75.7%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 12.9%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.4%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bolivia Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bolivia
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
20.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%